Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ukraine coup 2014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (reply) |
m (reply) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The (sub)headings are should be accessible to the uninitiated on this topic - so "Evidence that the Maidan snipers were NOT government security personnel" is too specific (apart from the UNWANTED CAPS - I'd choose italics). I suggest a more general heading (e.g. "Contradictory Evidence", "Faul Play?" etc.) - let the reader read the specific details in the text as required. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 10:41, 9 March 2014 (GMT) | The (sub)headings are should be accessible to the uninitiated on this topic - so "Evidence that the Maidan snipers were NOT government security personnel" is too specific (apart from the UNWANTED CAPS - I'd choose italics). I suggest a more general heading (e.g. "Contradictory Evidence", "Faul Play?" etc.) - let the reader read the specific details in the text as required. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 10:41, 9 March 2014 (GMT) | ||
| − | :Dive in Robin - your edits always improve things and I'm so immersed in the minutiae of this and its horribly complex antecedents that I'm paying less attention to style than I should - just trying not to miss stuff that the {{ccm}} | + | :Dive in Robin - your edits always improve things and I'm so immersed in the minutiae of this and its horribly complex antecedents that I'm paying less attention to style than I should - just trying not to miss stuff that the {{ccm}} suppress/ignore. Also note, I intend to do a separate page on Judaic influence and power in Ukraine, then reduce that section to a para with a standard link the the full article - when I get around to it as always --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 13:49, 9 March 2014 (GMT) |
| + | |||
| + | == Timeline == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Are there any plans to introduce a timeline on this article - like the one on MH17? --[[User:Two Dogs|Two Dogs]] ([[User talk:Two Dogs|talk]]) 13:10, 22 August 2014 (IST) | ||
| + | :We're a bit inhibited on new timelines by both the technicalities of current implementation and the flakiness of the extensions themselves. That said I'd rather roll more out as-is than wait for better(perfect?) technical implementation - especially if there are editors keen to contribute. So, I'll get one set up for this asap - probably also for the civil war too since that too is a classic timeline subject. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 13:30, 22 August 2014 (IST) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:30, 22 August 2014
Subheadings
The (sub)headings are should be accessible to the uninitiated on this topic - so "Evidence that the Maidan snipers were NOT government security personnel" is too specific (apart from the UNWANTED CAPS - I'd choose italics). I suggest a more general heading (e.g. "Contradictory Evidence", "Faul Play?" etc.) - let the reader read the specific details in the text as required. Robin (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
- Dive in Robin - your edits always improve things and I'm so immersed in the minutiae of this and its horribly complex antecedents that I'm paying less attention to style than I should - just trying not to miss stuff that the commercially-controlled media suppress/ignore. Also note, I intend to do a separate page on Judaic influence and power in Ukraine, then reduce that section to a para with a standard link the the full article - when I get around to it as always --Peter P (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
Timeline
Are there any plans to introduce a timeline on this article - like the one on MH17? --Two Dogs (talk) 13:10, 22 August 2014 (IST)
- We're a bit inhibited on new timelines by both the technicalities of current implementation and the flakiness of the extensions themselves. That said I'd rather roll more out as-is than wait for better(perfect?) technical implementation - especially if there are editors keen to contribute. So, I'll get one set up for this asap - probably also for the civil war too since that too is a classic timeline subject. --Peter P (talk) 13:30, 22 August 2014 (IST)
