Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks talk:Semantic Properties"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Current thoughts: new section)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Overall I'm fairly happy with these, though there are a few syntactic irregularities I'm planning on ironing out, the main one being an irregularity of case use for the object templates. With [[Special:ReplaceText]] it's a simple enough matter. I may make a distinction between "Has X" to describe properties relating to X (e.g. X has originalTitle Y) and "X'ed" to describe interrelationships between items, (e.g. X killed Y). [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 11:07, 21 January 2014 (GMT)
 
Overall I'm fairly happy with these, though there are a few syntactic irregularities I'm planning on ironing out, the main one being an irregularity of case use for the object templates. With [[Special:ReplaceText]] it's a simple enough matter. I may make a distinction between "Has X" to describe properties relating to X (e.g. X has originalTitle Y) and "X'ed" to describe interrelationships between items, (e.g. X killed Y). [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 11:07, 21 January 2014 (GMT)
 +
 +
:I've nothing useful to add. On my own, properties simply would have not been developed to anything like the current extent. The project to date represents a major site enhancement and I'm happy for you to use your judgement. Just ask if/when you want input from me. Otherwise I'll chip if I see a need. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 12:44, 21 January 2014 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 15:51, 25 June 2015

Current thoughts

Overall I'm fairly happy with these, though there are a few syntactic irregularities I'm planning on ironing out, the main one being an irregularity of case use for the object templates. With Special:ReplaceText it's a simple enough matter. I may make a distinction between "Has X" to describe properties relating to X (e.g. X has originalTitle Y) and "X'ed" to describe interrelationships between items, (e.g. X killed Y). Robin (talk) 11:07, 21 January 2014 (GMT)

I've nothing useful to add. On my own, properties simply would have not been developed to anything like the current extent. The project to date represents a major site enhancement and I'm happy for you to use your judgement. Just ask if/when you want input from me. Otherwise I'll chip if I see a need. --Peter P (talk) 12:44, 21 January 2014 (GMT)