Difference between revisions of "Talk:Operation Gladio"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Location, Location, Location...) |
(High traffic) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{HighTraffic|As of July 2014, this was Google's #2 hit on {{t|Operation Gladio}}}} | ||
==Should this be here?== | ==Should this be here?== | ||
Doesn't it belong in the {{NS|Document}}? [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:05, 4 January 2014 (GMT) | Doesn't it belong in the {{NS|Document}}? [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:05, 4 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I don't think so. It was done by a DPF colleague, [http://www.malcolmpryce.com/ Malcolm Pryce] - Author of some very droll Welsh humour after the style of certain 1950's detective fiction. He doesn't seek credit for it and it can be edited and added to. Doesn't really need to be billed as a digest either but, since Daniel Ganser was also consulted on it the book should remain prominently credited. BTW - it is another highly visited page, though less so than 9/11:Israel did it --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 16:43, 4 January 2014 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 09:29, 23 July 2014
Should this be here?
Doesn't it belong in the Document: namespace? Robin (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2014 (GMT)
- I don't think so. It was done by a DPF colleague, Malcolm Pryce - Author of some very droll Welsh humour after the style of certain 1950's detective fiction. He doesn't seek credit for it and it can be edited and added to. Doesn't really need to be billed as a digest either but, since Daniel Ganser was also consulted on it the book should remain prominently credited. BTW - it is another highly visited page, though less so than 9/11:Israel did it --Peter P (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2014 (GMT)