Difference between revisions of "Template talk:KnownParticipants"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This one is clever, could you add one the same template for groups as well?
 
This one is clever, could you add one the same template for groups as well?
 
[[User:Terje|Terje]] ([[User talk:Terje|talk]]) 23:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 
[[User:Terje|Terje]] ([[User talk:Terje|talk]]) 23:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 +
 +
With the proviso that it should be included in [[Template:SMWDocs]], rather than added by hand, yes, that should be too tricky. By an SMW quirk, UnknownParticipants is harder, so the simple: "Unknown Participants", "Known Participants", structure is not yet available. This being the case, when should 'KnownX' be deployed as an extra section ahead of 'AllX'? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I believe it is more to the point if known participants, 'KnownX', are first, since they have a Wikispooks article. AllX is just a large heap of unfamiliar names.
 +
[[User:Terje|Terje]] ([[User talk:Terje|talk]]) 22:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:40, 27 December 2022

This one is clever, could you add one the same template for groups as well? Terje (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

With the proviso that it should be included in Template:SMWDocs, rather than added by hand, yes, that should be too tricky. By an SMW quirk, UnknownParticipants is harder, so the simple: "Unknown Participants", "Known Participants", structure is not yet available. This being the case, when should 'KnownX' be deployed as an extra section ahead of 'AllX'? -- Robin (talk) 15:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I believe it is more to the point if known participants, 'KnownX', are first, since they have a Wikispooks article. AllX is just a large heap of unfamiliar names.

Terje (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)