Difference between revisions of "De Volkskrant"
(logo) |
(Maarten Keulemans jab hit piece) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|source_URL= | |source_URL= | ||
|source_name= | |source_name= | ||
| − | }}'''''De Volkskrant''''' is a Dutch [[newspaper]]. | + | }}'''''De Volkskrant''''' is a Dutch [[newspaper]], often described as "[[left-liberal]]".<ref>https://www.eurotopics.net/en/148496/de-volkskrant</ref> |
==Reporting== | ==Reporting== | ||
| − | In 2021 De Volkskrant reported that the Dutch government suppressed [[financial fraud]] by the [[White Helmets]].<ref>https://www.rt.com/op-ed/523413-dutch-government-fraud-white-helmets/</ref> | + | In 2021 ''De Volkskrant'' reported that the Dutch government suppressed [[financial fraud]] by the [[White Helmets]].<ref>https://www.rt.com/op-ed/523413-dutch-government-fraud-white-helmets/</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ==Covid jabs== | ||
| + | In June 2024, ''Volkskrant'' published a hit piece<ref name=hit/> against a study<ref>https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282</ref> showing a connection between [[Covid jab|COVID mRNA "vaccines"]] and an increase in global mortality. The study, with lead author [[Saskia Mostert]], was published in the [[British Medical Journal]], but came under an organized backlash aimed at forcing a retraction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The ''Volkskrant'' article was penned by the strongly pro-vaccine<ref>https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/boosterprik-beschermt-ouderen-beter-tegen-ernstige-corona~ba33d7bf/?referrer=https://www.google.com/</ref> journalist [[Maarten Keulemans]]<ref>https://archive.is/2024.06.11-180900/https://www.volkskrant.nl/wetenschap/prinses-maxima-centrum-neemt-nadrukkelijk-afstand-van-omstreden-antivaxstudie-oncologen~bfa34cc0/</ref>, who cited physicians and "[[scientist]]" known for their unwavering support of the mRNA products.<ref name=aussie>https://www.aussie17.com/p/breaking-medical-censorship-complex</ref> The article, with headline ''Princess Máxima Center emphatically distances itself from controversial’ anti-wax study' oncologists'', quoted a statement from the [[Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology]], Saskia Mostert's employer, which stated it "is severely embarrassed by a study that was published last week. The study wrongly suggests that the excess mortality observed in various countries after the coronavirus crisis is due to vaccines. If it turns out that the authors acted 'carelessly', the hospital will withdraw the article from the medical journal BMJ Public Health".<ref name=hit>https://archive.is/2024.06.11-180900/https://www.volkskrant.nl/wetenschap/prinses-maxima-centrum-neemt-nadrukkelijk-afstand-van-omstreden-antivaxstudie-oncologen~bfa34cc0/#selection-1027.0-1027.89</ref> The Center received funding from among others [[Pfizer]].<ref>https://research.prinsesmaximacentrum.nl/en/inotuzumab-b1931036-all</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:32, 15 June 2024
 De Volkskrant  (newspaper)   | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Type | newspaper |
| Founded | 1919 |
| Author(s) | |
De Volkskrant is a Dutch newspaper, often described as "left-liberal".[1]
Reporting
In 2021 De Volkskrant reported that the Dutch government suppressed financial fraud by the White Helmets.[2]
Covid jabs
In June 2024, Volkskrant published a hit piece[3] against a study[4] showing a connection between COVID mRNA "vaccines" and an increase in global mortality. The study, with lead author Saskia Mostert, was published in the British Medical Journal, but came under an organized backlash aimed at forcing a retraction.
The Volkskrant article was penned by the strongly pro-vaccine[5] journalist Maarten Keulemans[6], who cited physicians and "scientist" known for their unwavering support of the mRNA products.[7] The article, with headline Princess Máxima Center emphatically distances itself from controversial’ anti-wax study' oncologists, quoted a statement from the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Saskia Mostert's employer, which stated it "is severely embarrassed by a study that was published last week. The study wrongly suggests that the excess mortality observed in various countries after the coronavirus crisis is due to vaccines. If it turns out that the authors acted 'carelessly', the hospital will withdraw the article from the medical journal BMJ Public Health".[3] The Center received funding from among others Pfizer.[8]
References
- ↑ https://www.eurotopics.net/en/148496/de-volkskrant
- ↑ https://www.rt.com/op-ed/523413-dutch-government-fraud-white-helmets/
- ↑ a b https://archive.is/2024.06.11-180900/https://www.volkskrant.nl/wetenschap/prinses-maxima-centrum-neemt-nadrukkelijk-afstand-van-omstreden-antivaxstudie-oncologen~bfa34cc0/#selection-1027.0-1027.89
- ↑ https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282
- ↑ https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/boosterprik-beschermt-ouderen-beter-tegen-ernstige-corona~ba33d7bf/?referrer=https://www.google.com/
- ↑ https://archive.is/2024.06.11-180900/https://www.volkskrant.nl/wetenschap/prinses-maxima-centrum-neemt-nadrukkelijk-afstand-van-omstreden-antivaxstudie-oncologen~bfa34cc0/
- ↑ https://www.aussie17.com/p/breaking-medical-censorship-complex
- ↑ https://research.prinsesmaximacentrum.nl/en/inotuzumab-b1931036-all
