Difference between revisions of "Talk:John Ashton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a high traffic page. As of March 2015, this was Google's #1 hit on John Ashton
m (add item) |
(Added Talk template) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{talk}} | ||
| + | {{HighTraffic|As of March 2015, this was Google's #1 hit on {{t|John Ashton}}}} | ||
==First person commentary== | ==First person commentary== | ||
Hi Patrick - and thanks for all the solid stuff you are contributing. There is no problem with knowledgeable people arguing relevant thesis at length. However, in the spirit of a reference work, it is preferable that any grammatically first person text be clearly attributed and deliniated. I've taken the liberty of doing that on this article. Please feel free to make further changes. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 07:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | Hi Patrick - and thanks for all the solid stuff you are contributing. There is no problem with knowledgeable people arguing relevant thesis at length. However, in the spirit of a reference work, it is preferable that any grammatically first person text be clearly attributed and deliniated. I've taken the liberty of doing that on this article. Please feel free to make further changes. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 07:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Sorry for the confusion [[User:Peter|Peter P]]. The first person text was not mine: it was from the blogger 'baz' (aka [[Barry Walker]]) as is referenced [http://edsblogcity.blogspot.co.uk/2009/10/blog-post.html?showComment=1259764729818#c1908785357458437719 here]. I'm therefore clarifying this point in the article. [[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] 12:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Oops - my mistake - I've corrected it and made the quote clear --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 13:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::There is still first person stuff here, "I am not John Ashton's biggest fan..." for which I can see no valid reference. This should either be removed or remedied, since who is the "I" referring to? That whole section is in need of reworking. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 01:04, 4 December 2015 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:05, 4 December 2015
First person commentary
Hi Patrick - and thanks for all the solid stuff you are contributing. There is no problem with knowledgeable people arguing relevant thesis at length. However, in the spirit of a reference work, it is preferable that any grammatically first person text be clearly attributed and deliniated. I've taken the liberty of doing that on this article. Please feel free to make further changes. --Peter P 07:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for the confusion Peter P. The first person text was not mine: it was from the blogger 'baz' (aka Barry Walker) as is referenced here. I'm therefore clarifying this point in the article. Patrick Haseldine 12:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oops - my mistake - I've corrected it and made the quote clear --Peter P 13:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
