Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
Difference between revisions of "Document talk:Israel's International Conspiracy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(''Misleading'' subjects) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==''Misleading'' subjects== | ==''Misleading'' subjects== | ||
It's a pity if for no good reason we have to cull the likes of [https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=Document:Israel%27s_International_Conspiracy&diff=86391&oldid=86380 Jill Stein, Bernie Sanders, Jeremy Corbyn, Hillary Clinton and Andrew Cuomo] from [https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Philip_Giraldi#Philip_Giraldi_on_Wikispooks Philip Giraldi's seminal article].--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 11:00, 15 June 2016 (IST) | It's a pity if for no good reason we have to cull the likes of [https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=Document:Israel%27s_International_Conspiracy&diff=86391&oldid=86380 Jill Stein, Bernie Sanders, Jeremy Corbyn, Hillary Clinton and Andrew Cuomo] from [https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Philip_Giraldi#Philip_Giraldi_on_Wikispooks Philip Giraldi's seminal article].--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 11:00, 15 June 2016 (IST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::The subject is for denoting what an article ''is about'', not for denoting what it ''mentions'' or ''alludes to''. The reason is simple. Inclusion in the subject causes a document to be listed as a '''related document''' on the page of that subject, a high profile place, and it is discouraging and unexpected to cause documents to appear there which are not about that subject. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:31, 15 June 2016 (IST) |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 15 June 2016
Misleading subjects
It's a pity if for no good reason we have to cull the likes of Jill Stein, Bernie Sanders, Jeremy Corbyn, Hillary Clinton and Andrew Cuomo from Philip Giraldi's seminal article.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2016 (IST)
- The subject is for denoting what an article is about, not for denoting what it mentions or alludes to. The reason is simple. Inclusion in the subject causes a document to be listed as a related document on the page of that subject, a high profile place, and it is discouraging and unexpected to cause documents to appear there which are not about that subject. Robin (talk) 18:31, 15 June 2016 (IST)