Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia:9/11 conspiracy theories"
(Linkify) |
m (Text replacement - "[[Wikispooks:" to "[[Project:") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|WsLink0=9/11 | |WsLink0=9/11 | ||
|WPBias=No | |WPBias=No | ||
| − | |WpIntro=Although [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories the Wikipedia page] a reasonable (if necessarily condensed) summary of the main areas of dissent from the [[ | + | |WpIntro=Although [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories the Wikipedia page] a reasonable (if necessarily condensed) summary of the main areas of dissent from the [[Project:Definitions|'official narrative']], it exemplifies how the commercially controlled media twist dissent that is so credible that it cannot be simply ignored or ridiculed. Any suggestions that the [[wikispooks:Definitions|official narrative]] (a theory of a conspiracy) may contain deliberate lies is, by definition, mere [[:Category:Conspiracy Theory|Conspiracy Theory]]. |
|WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories | |WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories | ||
|WPCensored=No | |WPCensored=No | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|WsLink1=9/11:Israel did it | |WsLink1=9/11:Israel did it | ||
|WsLink1Desc=Extensive collection of evidence that Israel, Mossad and US citizens with dual US-Israeli citizenship loyal to Zionism, were deeply complicit in the attacks | |WsLink1Desc=Extensive collection of evidence that Israel, Mossad and US citizens with dual US-Israeli citizenship loyal to Zionism, were deeply complicit in the attacks | ||
| − | | | + | |WsLink9= |
| − | | | + | |WsLink9Desc= |
|WsLink3=Nuclear Demolition | |WsLink3=Nuclear Demolition | ||
|WsLink3Desc=Reconstruction of an article which was deleted from Wikipedia soon after it was posted. It concerns the theory of nuclear demolition of tall buildings and argues that the nature of the WTC building collapses is congruent with nuclear demolition | |WsLink3Desc=Reconstruction of an article which was deleted from Wikipedia soon after it was posted. It concerns the theory of nuclear demolition of tall buildings and argues that the nature of the WTC building collapses is congruent with nuclear demolition | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|WsLink7Desc=Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11. An article by Kevin Ryan originally published in Foreign Policy Journal 18 November 2010 | |WsLink7Desc=Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11. An article by Kevin Ryan originally published in Foreign Policy Journal 18 November 2010 | ||
|WsLink8=Document:Andreas von Buelow - Interview | |WsLink8=Document:Andreas von Buelow - Interview | ||
| − | |WsLink8Desc=Interview with Andreas von Buelow published in Tagesspiegel on 13 January 2002, noteworthy because it is an [[ | + | |WsLink8Desc=Interview with Andreas von Buelow published in Tagesspiegel on 13 January 2002, noteworthy because it is an [[Project:Definitions|official narrative]]" dissenting opinion, from a former senior member of the German government. |
| − | | | + | |WsLink2=Document:Making sense of the media cover-up of 9/11 |
| − | | | + | |WsLink2Desc=An article by investigative journalist and author Christopher Bollyn |
|ExLink1=http://www.ae911truth.org/ | |ExLink1=http://www.ae911truth.org/ | ||
|ExLink1Name=Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth | |ExLink1Name=Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth | ||
| − | |ExLink1Desc=Influential 9/11 Truth group with over | + | |ExLink1Desc=Influential 9/11 Truth group with over 2000 professional members |
|ExLink2=http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ | |ExLink2=http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ | ||
|ExLink2Name=Pilots for 9/11 Truth | |ExLink2Name=Pilots for 9/11 Truth | ||
Latest revision as of 16:00, 3 January 2016
 9/11
|
 9/11 conspiracy theories
|
|
Although the Wikipedia page a reasonable (if necessarily condensed) summary of the main areas of dissent from the 'official narrative', it exemplifies how the commercially controlled media twist dissent that is so credible that it cannot be simply ignored or ridiculed. Any suggestions that the official narrative (a theory of a conspiracy) may contain deliberate lies is, by definition, mere Conspiracy Theory. |
The official story is so full of holes and contradictions that to suggest that one page is all that is needed on the topic is ridiculous. As it is not commercially controlled, Wikispooks can devote adequate space to investigating these important topics. If you are in any doubt as to how much you have been lied to by commercial media, 9/11 is worth studying in depth.
Related Wikispooks Pages
9/11:Israel did it - Extensive collection of evidence that Israel, Mossad and US citizens with dual US-Israeli citizenship loyal to Zionism, were deeply complicit in the attacks Document:Making sense of the media cover-up of 9/11 - An article by investigative journalist and author Christopher Bollyn Nuclear Demolition - Reconstruction of an article which was deleted from Wikipedia soon after it was posted. It concerns the theory of nuclear demolition of tall buildings and argues that the nature of the WTC building collapses is congruent with nuclear demolition Document:Waging the Battle for Reality - A Review Essay on a Propagandist’s Journey in Search of his so-called ‘Conspiracist Underground’ by Anthony J. Hall Professor of Globalization Studies at the University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Cananda. Originally published by Salem-News.com, 29 May 2011 File:911 Abnormal Trading.pdf - A detailed technical study of S&P 500 options trading prior to the 9/11 attacks from the National University of Singapore which concludes that it was "consistent with insiders anticipating the 9-11 attacks" Document:The use of terrorism to construct world order - A paper by Norwegian Academic Ola Tunander, presented at the Fifth Pan-European International Relations Conference (Panel 28 Geopolitics) Netherlands Congress Centre, The Hague, 9-11 September 2004 Document:9/11 Insider Trading - Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11. An article by Kevin Ryan originally published in Foreign Policy Journal 18 November 2010 Document:Andreas von Buelow - Interview - Interview with Andreas von Buelow published in Tagesspiegel on 13 January 2002, noteworthy because it is an official narrative" dissenting opinion, from a former senior member of the German government.
External Links
- Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth - Influential 9/11 Truth group with over 2000 professional members
- Pilots for 9/11 Truth -
- 911Truth.org -
- List of 50 alternative radio shows on 9/11 -
