Difference between revisions of "Talk:Globalization"
(new topic) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Thanks for starting page== | ==Thanks for starting page== | ||
TS - Thanks for the start. However, can I ask you to re-consider the description. The elites and powers driving the Globalisation end-game are, by definition, trans-national and so cannot be accurately described as THE 'Deep State' when there are many States, each with its own 'Deep' elements. Globalist individuals have varying degrees of (outwardly expressed) loyalty to this or that State, but for those at the top, such loyalties are nothing more than the means to an end - flag-waving to herd the gullible IOW. It is a difficult area with terminology more slippery than usual but I feel we must try to be as precise as possible - even if it involves developing and refining existing woolly terminology. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 17:39, 31 August 2014 (IST) | TS - Thanks for the start. However, can I ask you to re-consider the description. The elites and powers driving the Globalisation end-game are, by definition, trans-national and so cannot be accurately described as THE 'Deep State' when there are many States, each with its own 'Deep' elements. Globalist individuals have varying degrees of (outwardly expressed) loyalty to this or that State, but for those at the top, such loyalties are nothing more than the means to an end - flag-waving to herd the gullible IOW. It is a difficult area with terminology more slippery than usual but I feel we must try to be as precise as possible - even if it involves developing and refining existing woolly terminology. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 17:39, 31 August 2014 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Oops. We already have a [[Globalisation]] page too - UK as opposed to US spelling. Since there are already many pages pointing to it, I think it best to move this content to it and leave a redirect.I'll get on and do it. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 17:43, 31 August 2014 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Peter-already done, and feel free to edit my description if you like --[[User:TruthSeeker611|TruthSeeker611]] ([[User talk:TruthSeeker611|talk]]) 12:50 31 August 2014 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:51, 31 August 2014
Thanks for starting page
TS - Thanks for the start. However, can I ask you to re-consider the description. The elites and powers driving the Globalisation end-game are, by definition, trans-national and so cannot be accurately described as THE 'Deep State' when there are many States, each with its own 'Deep' elements. Globalist individuals have varying degrees of (outwardly expressed) loyalty to this or that State, but for those at the top, such loyalties are nothing more than the means to an end - flag-waving to herd the gullible IOW. It is a difficult area with terminology more slippery than usual but I feel we must try to be as precise as possible - even if it involves developing and refining existing woolly terminology. --Peter P (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2014 (IST)
- Oops. We already have a Globalisation page too - UK as opposed to US spelling. Since there are already many pages pointing to it, I think it best to move this content to it and leave a redirect.I'll get on and do it. --Peter P (talk) 17:43, 31 August 2014 (IST)
Peter-already done, and feel free to edit my description if you like --TruthSeeker611 (talk) 12:50 31 August 2014 (EST)
