Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mats Wilander"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I vote keep) |
m (Vote KEEP) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Quite probably peripheral, but... == | == Quite probably peripheral, but... == | ||
I was interested to read that Wilander had booked a seat on this flight and decided not to use it. My [[Occam's razor]] says "pure coincidence", but then I'm no expert on either [[Lockerbie]] or the habits of world class sportsmen. But even if there is only a small chance that, for example, he was tipped off or deliberately obstructed from getting on the flight, it's worth having here. Someone else with different information might apply Occam's razor and draw a different conclusion, of course. Vote: '''Keep''' -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC) | I was interested to read that Wilander had booked a seat on this flight and decided not to use it. My [[Occam's razor]] says "pure coincidence", but then I'm no expert on either [[Lockerbie]] or the habits of world class sportsmen. But even if there is only a small chance that, for example, he was tipped off or deliberately obstructed from getting on the flight, it's worth having here. Someone else with different information might apply Occam's razor and draw a different conclusion, of course. Vote: '''Keep''' -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[[Chris Nicholson]] doesn't regard Mats Wilander as peripheral to [[Pan Am Flight 103]]. Nor do I. Vote: '''Keep''' --[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 22:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:43, 1 April 2024
Quite probably peripheral, but...
I was interested to read that Wilander had booked a seat on this flight and decided not to use it. My Occam's razor says "pure coincidence", but then I'm no expert on either Lockerbie or the habits of world class sportsmen. But even if there is only a small chance that, for example, he was tipped off or deliberately obstructed from getting on the flight, it's worth having here. Someone else with different information might apply Occam's razor and draw a different conclusion, of course. Vote: Keep -- Robin (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Chris Nicholson doesn't regard Mats Wilander as peripheral to Pan Am Flight 103. Nor do I. Vote: Keep --Patrick Haseldine (talk) 22:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
