Difference between revisions of "Talk:Controversy in Loudon County"
(Created page with "1. The article start off by saying that controversy started in the county from 2020, but... there is always controversy in any county in the US. A lot of things happened befor...") |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
4. The article has not been updated with the fact the DA was removed and lost her donors. So... now, the article doesn't have any deep political insight? The Daily Wire reported the story with the narrative of the "progressive" elected county prosecutor who ran on a platform of ending "mass incarceration," but yet she sought jail time for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, both misdemeanor charges, against Scott Smith. That angle would fit this site. Or could have included her as deep state lawyer, stretching it, but ok. (future wanted page). | 4. The article has not been updated with the fact the DA was removed and lost her donors. So... now, the article doesn't have any deep political insight? The Daily Wire reported the story with the narrative of the "progressive" elected county prosecutor who ran on a platform of ending "mass incarceration," but yet she sought jail time for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, both misdemeanor charges, against Scott Smith. That angle would fit this site. Or could have included her as deep state lawyer, stretching it, but ok. (future wanted page). | ||
| − | 5. FOX News angle was that this was a personal thing between the DA and the father of the rape victim, and repeats the angle that the Daily wire took that she is aiding crime by not doing anything. Just go with that would be my guess. So I'd added your text to Virgina, removed your article and added that piece of info to the Virginia and Soros, and TDW page. | + | 5. FOX News angle was that this was a personal thing between the DA and the father of the rape victim, and repeats the angle that the Daily wire took that she is aiding crime by not doing anything. Just go with that would be my guess. So I'd added your text to Virgina, removed your article and added that piece of info to the Virginia and Soros, and TDW page. [[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 09:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:43, 8 August 2023
1. The article start off by saying that controversy started in the county from 2020, but... there is always controversy in any county in the US. A lot of things happened before 2020.
2. One rape with a DA financed partly by Soros is not a third rail topic. First of all, it was in the news, locally and nationally. A rape needs to have a deep political insight, otherwise, it it better fitted to the location, the person of interest that may be interesting to our readers or the circumstances or just the rape page. 1000s of people get raped, multiple CIA officers, ICE agents and police officers get convicted. That doesn't cut it.
3. Soros spends $40 million to elect DAs throughtout the US, often left, that not see less crime rates (softly said), that would be an angle. 4. The article has not been updated with the fact the DA was removed and lost her donors. So... now, the article doesn't have any deep political insight? The Daily Wire reported the story with the narrative of the "progressive" elected county prosecutor who ran on a platform of ending "mass incarceration," but yet she sought jail time for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, both misdemeanor charges, against Scott Smith. That angle would fit this site. Or could have included her as deep state lawyer, stretching it, but ok. (future wanted page).
5. FOX News angle was that this was a personal thing between the DA and the father of the rape victim, and repeats the angle that the Daily wire took that she is aiding crime by not doing anything. Just go with that would be my guess. So I'd added your text to Virgina, removed your article and added that piece of info to the Virginia and Soros, and TDW page. Jun (talk) 09:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
