Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Templates"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Organise?) |
m (reply) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 03:44, 30 April 2013 (IST) | [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 03:44, 30 April 2013 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Agreed Robin. I will also put templates and project related pages into the category tree. When I first did that it was intended for content pages only with its top-level excluding all the techie stuff. I often find myself rooting around for template I know exists so I will make it a priority --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:57, 30 April 2013 (IST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:57, 30 April 2013
Organising
These have grown fairly organically up to now, I think, but I think they could do with a tidy. This would mean:
- Reviewing current use
- Eliminating redundancy
- Creating new ones
- Standardising appearance, e.g. red for critical/error, orange for warning, green/blue for info/note etc.
Possibly also drawing up some kind of explanatopry document to help editors/readers interpret them (or even better, linking to one such that already exists?) Any thoughts?
Robin (talk) 03:44, 30 April 2013 (IST)
- Agreed Robin. I will also put templates and project related pages into the category tree. When I first did that it was intended for content pages only with its top-level excluding all the techie stuff. I often find myself rooting around for template I know exists so I will make it a priority --Peter P (talk) 07:57, 30 April 2013 (IST)
