Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hate group/Criticism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(ll) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
How about putting this in the {{NS|document}}, since its from a third party source? The points it makes are important enough for their own page here, so what about [[Hate group/Criticism]] or [[Hate group/problems]] as a WS page. Since it is an example of [[wikipedia's censorship]], we could use {{t|constitutes=Wikipedia/Censorship}}. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 04:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC) | How about putting this in the {{NS|document}}, since its from a third party source? The points it makes are important enough for their own page here, so what about [[Hate group/Criticism]] or [[Hate group/problems]] as a WS page. Since it is an example of [[wikipedia's censorship]], we could use {{t|constitutes=Wikipedia/Censorship}}. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 04:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | :I pondered a document too but think it probably best to rename the page to [[Hate group/Criticism]] and credit the original | + | :I pondered a document too but think it probably best to rename the page to [[Hate group/Criticism]] and credit the original with <Code>PageCredit</code> in the usual way. The content can then be sectionalised, added to and generally improved upon. --[[User:Peter|Peter]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC) |
:OTOH - making it into a document would auto-link it to lots of other content so your call --[[User:Peter|Peter]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC) | :OTOH - making it into a document would auto-link it to lots of other content so your call --[[User:Peter|Peter]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Third thoughts. Document probably best so I've done it --[[User:Peter|Peter]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 11:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:13, 22 June 2019
Where to put this?
How about putting this in the document: namespace, since its from a third party source? The points it makes are important enough for their own page here, so what about Hate group/Criticism or Hate group/problems as a WS page. Since it is an example of wikipedia's censorship, we could use . -- Robin (talk) 04:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- I pondered a document too but think it probably best to rename the page to Hate group/Criticism and credit the original with
PageCreditin the usual way. The content can then be sectionalised, added to and generally improved upon. --Peter (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
