Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia:USS Liberty incident"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Improve clarity)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{WpPage
 
{{WpPage
 
|WsLink0=USS Liberty Incident
 
|WsLink0=USS Liberty Incident
|WpIntro=The Wikipedia page is a wordy treatment of the incident showing considerable bias. Only the section "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident#Details_in_dispute Details in Dispute]" provides much that is relevant to the unnecessary "dispute" over responsibility.
+
|WPBias=Yes
 
+
|WPNewsprint=No
The Wikispooks article includes a unique tabular listing of the various "Reliable Sources", indicating that almost no independent observers accept the "official" version.
+
|WpIntro=The Wikipedia page is unclear, one sided and contains a plethora of largely insignificant opinions. Only the section "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident#Details_in_dispute Details in Dispute]" provides much that is relevant to the unnecessary "dispute" over responsibility.
 
 
Wikispooks also carries some of the first-hand narratives of the American survivors, information mostly buried at the Wikipedia under a plethora of largely insignificant opinions. Some of the bias at Wikipedia is discussed.
 
 
|WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/{{PAGENAMEE}}
 
|WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/{{PAGENAMEE}}
 +
|WPCensored=No
 +
|WPTwisted=No
 +
|WPGaps=No
 +
|WPUnclear=Yes
 +
|WsDesc=The Wikispooks article includes first-hand accounts by the American survivors and a table of the various "Reliable Sources", indicating that almost no independent observers accept the "official" version.
 +
[[Category:1967 Six Day War]]
 
|Stub=No
 
|Stub=No
|WsLink1=Document:USS Liberty - Government Betrayal and Cover-up
+
|ExLink1=http://www.gtr5.com/
|WsLink1Desc=Article in Hustler Magazine July 2008 issue. "Every American should be troubled by the fact that the President of the United States and the Secretary of Defense prevented the US Sixth Fleet from protecting a US Navy ship and its 294-man crew from foreign attack. They should also be troubled that the President ordered the Navy to determine the attack was unintentional" Paul Craig Roberts (b 1939) is a former editor of the Wall Street Journal and served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration earning fame as a co-founder of Reaganomics." He has written or co-written eight books.
+
|ExLink1Name=USS Liberty Memorial
|Notes=[[Category:1967 Six Day War]]
+
|ExLink1Desc=The website of the survivors.
 +
|ExLink2=http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/margolis12.html
 +
|ExLink2Name='The USS Liberty': America's Most Shameful Secret
 +
|ExLink2Desc=Cover-Up Alleged in Probe of USS Liberty
 +
|ExLink3=http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/ussliberty.html
 +
|ExLink3Name=If Americans Knew
 +
|ExLink3Desc=According to former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer, “Those men were then betrayed and left to die by our own government.”
 +
|ExLink4=http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ussliberty.html
 +
|ExLink4Name=What Really Happened.com
 +
|ExLink4Desc=Cover-Up Alleged in Probe of USS Liberty
 +
|ExLink5=http://articles.cnn.com/2001-04-23/us/liberty.attack_1_israeli-attack-israeli-soldiers-ship?_s=PM:US
 +
|ExLink5Name=CNN - Israel's 1967 attack on U.S. ship deliberate, book says.
 +
|ExLink5Desc=The attack, in which 34 American sailors died, was carried out to prevent the United States from eavesdropping on Israeli military activities, author James Bamford writes.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 15:33, 3 July 2012


USS Liberty Incident USS Liberty Incident
WpIcon32.png USS Liberty incident






Bias Obfuscation  The Wikipedia page is unclear, one sided and contains a plethora of largely insignificant opinions. Only the section "Details in Dispute" provides much that is relevant to the unnecessary "dispute" over responsibility.

The Wikispooks article includes first-hand accounts by the American survivors and a table of the various "Reliable Sources", indicating that almost no independent observers accept the "official" version.

Related Wikispooks Pages


External Links