Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Black Operations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (reply) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Robin|Robin]] 16:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | [[User:Robin|Robin]] 16:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | Agreed. It's a constantly evolving task though and applies to the entire existing category set. A Project namespace page about categories is on my todo list too. They really are pretty fundamental to finding things on wikis. EVERY article should be assigned a category and if there isn't a reasonably applicable one, then a new one needs to be created. Also EVERY category needs to belong to at least one of the existing categories so it appears somewhere in the main [[MediaWiki:Category Tree | + | :Agreed. It's a constantly evolving task though and applies to the entire existing category set. A Project namespace page about categories is on my todo list too. They really are pretty fundamental to finding things on wikis. EVERY article should be assigned a category and if there isn't a reasonably applicable one, then a new one needs to be created. Also EVERY category needs to belong to at least one of the existing categories so it appears somewhere in the main [[MediaWiki:Category Tree|category tree]] page. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 19:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:25, 20 March 2012
Merge with Covert Operations? I'm finding these categories need simplifying/standardising. Robin 16:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's a constantly evolving task though and applies to the entire existing category set. A Project namespace page about categories is on my todo list too. They really are pretty fundamental to finding things on wikis. EVERY article should be assigned a category and if there isn't a reasonably applicable one, then a new one needs to be created. Also EVERY category needs to belong to at least one of the existing categories so it appears somewhere in the main category tree page. --Peter P 19:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
