Difference between revisions of "2001 Anthrax attacks"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add Legal Action section)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
On August 6, 2008, federal prosecutors declared Ivins to be the sole culprit of the crime.<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/06/anthrax.case/index.html?eref=rss_topstories U.S. officials declare researcher is anthrax killer] CNN 6 August 2008</ref>  Two days later, Sen. Charles Grassley and Rep. Rush Holt called for hearings into the DOJ and FBI's handling of the investigation. <ref>[http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/middleeast/la-na-anthrax8-2008aug08,0,2258246.story Anthrax investigation should be investigated, congressmen say] Associated Press 8 August  2008</ref> <ref>ISBN 978-1-60239-715-6 The Anthrax Letters: A Bioterrorism Expert Investigates the Attacks That Shocked America-Case Closed?</ref> On February 19, 2010, the FBI formally closed its investigation. <ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/us/20anthrax.html F.B.I., Laying Out Evidence, Closes Anthrax Letters Case] New York Times 19 February 2010</ref>
 
On August 6, 2008, federal prosecutors declared Ivins to be the sole culprit of the crime.<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/06/anthrax.case/index.html?eref=rss_topstories U.S. officials declare researcher is anthrax killer] CNN 6 August 2008</ref>  Two days later, Sen. Charles Grassley and Rep. Rush Holt called for hearings into the DOJ and FBI's handling of the investigation. <ref>[http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/middleeast/la-na-anthrax8-2008aug08,0,2258246.story Anthrax investigation should be investigated, congressmen say] Associated Press 8 August  2008</ref> <ref>ISBN 978-1-60239-715-6 The Anthrax Letters: A Bioterrorism Expert Investigates the Attacks That Shocked America-Case Closed?</ref> On February 19, 2010, the FBI formally closed its investigation. <ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/us/20anthrax.html F.B.I., Laying Out Evidence, Closes Anthrax Letters Case] New York Times 19 February 2010</ref>
  
A review of the science used in the investigation is under way at the National Academy of Sciences. <ref>[http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2008/09/16-01.html?rss=1 Science review underway]</ref>  Some information about the case related to Ivins' mental problems is still "under seal." <ref>[http://www.justice.gov/amerithrax/docs/amx-investigative-summary.pdf FBI Summary Report] Footnote pp. 8</ref>  Lawsuits filed by the widow of victim Bob Stevens have not yet been settled. <ref>[http://www.palmbeachpost.com/opinion/editorials/settle-the-anthrax-lawsuit-government-has-made-maureen-286003.html Law Suits remain unsettled]</ref>
+
A review of the science used in the investigation is under way at the National Academy of Sciences. <ref>[http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2008/09/16-01.html?rss=1 Science review underway]</ref>  Some information about the case related to Ivins' mental problems is still "under seal." <ref>[http://www.justice.gov/amerithrax/docs/amx-investigative-summary.pdf FBI Summary Report] Footnote pp. 8</ref>   
 +
 
 +
== Legal Action ==
 +
 
 +
In 2008, the Justice Department agreed to pay $4.6 million to settle a lawsuit by another former Fort Detrick scientist, Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, whom investigators pursued for years before clearing him.<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/anthrax-victims-family-to-receive-2-5-million-in-settlement.html?_r=1</ref>
 +
 
 +
On 2011-07-15, the Justice Department lawters acknowledged in court papers that the sealed area in Ivins' lab — the so-called hot suite — did not contain the equipment needed to turn liquid anthrax into the refined powder that floated through congressional buildings and post offices in the fall of 2001. These statements were retracted 8 days later.<ref>http://www.propublica.org/article/justice-department-filing-casts-doubt-on-guilt-of-bruce-ivins-accused-in-an</ref>
 +
 
 +
On 2011-11-29, an 8 year legal battle that exposed slack rules and sloppy recordkeeping at the Army’s biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick, the federal government agreed to pay $2.5 million to the family of Robert Stevens, the first person killed in the anthrax letter attacks of 2001, settling a lawsuit claiming that the Army did not adequately secure its supply of the deadly pathogen. As part of the agreement, Justice Department lawyers are seeking to have many documents that were uncovered in the litigation kept under court seal or destroyed.<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/anthrax-victims-family-to-receive-2-5-million-in-settlement.html?_r=1</ref>
  
 
==External Sites==
 
==External Sites==
Line 13: Line 21:
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2001_anthrax_attacks Timeline of the 2001 anthrax attacks ]
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2001_anthrax_attacks Timeline of the 2001 anthrax attacks ]
  
==Update July 2011==
 
*[http://www.propublica.org/article/justice-department-filing-casts-doubt-on-guilt-of-bruce-ivins-accused-in-an Justice Department Filing Casts Doubt on Guilt of Bruce Ivins, Accused in Anthrax Case] - Pro Publica 18 July 2011
 
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 18:21, 30 November 2011

The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, also known as Amerithrax from its FBI case name, occurred over the course of several weeks beginning on September 18, 2001, one week after the September 11 attacks. Letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and two Democratic U.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others. The ensuing investigation is said by the FBI to have become "one of the largest and most complex in the history of law enforcement." [1]

Media reports focused on other possible suspects for years, but FBI files show that the investigation began to focus on Bruce Edwards Ivins as early as April 4, 2005, when Dr. Ivins told the FBI he would not talk any further without his lawyer present. On April 11, 2007, Dr. Ivins was put under periodic surveillance because "Bruce Edwards Ivins is an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks".[2] Ivins was a scientist who worked at the government's biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland. In June 2008, Ivins was told of the impending prosecution, and on July 27, 2008 it is claimed he committed suicide using an overdose of acetaminophen.[3]

On August 6, 2008, federal prosecutors declared Ivins to be the sole culprit of the crime.[4] Two days later, Sen. Charles Grassley and Rep. Rush Holt called for hearings into the DOJ and FBI's handling of the investigation. [5] [6] On February 19, 2010, the FBI formally closed its investigation. [7]

A review of the science used in the investigation is under way at the National Academy of Sciences. [8] Some information about the case related to Ivins' mental problems is still "under seal." [9]

Legal Action

In 2008, the Justice Department agreed to pay $4.6 million to settle a lawsuit by another former Fort Detrick scientist, Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, whom investigators pursued for years before clearing him.[10]

On 2011-07-15, the Justice Department lawters acknowledged in court papers that the sealed area in Ivins' lab — the so-called hot suite — did not contain the equipment needed to turn liquid anthrax into the refined powder that floated through congressional buildings and post offices in the fall of 2001. These statements were retracted 8 days later.[11]

On 2011-11-29, an 8 year legal battle that exposed slack rules and sloppy recordkeeping at the Army’s biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick, the federal government agreed to pay $2.5 million to the family of Robert Stevens, the first person killed in the anthrax letter attacks of 2001, settling a lawsuit claiming that the Army did not adequately secure its supply of the deadly pathogen. As part of the agreement, Justice Department lawyers are seeking to have many documents that were uncovered in the litigation kept under court seal or destroyed.[12]

External Sites

References