Difference between revisions of "Template talk:PropertyUseTable"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New topic) |
m (clarify) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Identifying already used 'wanted' subjects== | ==Identifying already used 'wanted' subjects== | ||
| − | At present the list displayed on property pages is in a system format sorted by Subject page and showing just 25 results with a 'more results' link. This makes it tedious to find subjects that are already defined, whether their pages exist or not. A sortable table | + | At present the list displayed on property pages is in a system format sorted by Subject page and showing just 25 results with a 'more results' link. This makes it tedious to find subjects that are already defined, whether their pages exist or not. A sortable table would solve the problem. This template was intended for use on property pages themselves. The idea being to provide a link to display a table view. The query works fine. However, it appears a separate page for each property needing a table view will be required, so, re-thinking. Ideas? --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 11:00, 22 December 2013 (GMT) |
Revision as of 11:02, 22 December 2013
Identifying already used 'wanted' subjects
At present the list displayed on property pages is in a system format sorted by Subject page and showing just 25 results with a 'more results' link. This makes it tedious to find subjects that are already defined, whether their pages exist or not. A sortable table would solve the problem. This template was intended for use on property pages themselves. The idea being to provide a link to display a table view. The query works fine. However, it appears a separate page for each property needing a table view will be required, so, re-thinking. Ideas? --Peter P (talk) 11:00, 22 December 2013 (GMT)
