Difference between revisions of "File:Wikipedia Conflict Dynamics.pdf"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
m (create page)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{FileProv
 +
|Source=[http://www.plosone.org/ PlosOne, Budapest]
 +
|Author=Taha Yasseri1, Robert Sumi1, András Rung, András Kornai1, János Kertész
 +
|Date=20 June 2012
 +
|Note=Pages in the Wikispooks '''[[:Category:WpPages|Wikipedia+]]''' category are good examples of the editorial conflicts explored in this document. They represent a selection of Wikipedia pages where '''''a compromise is far from achievable'''''
 +
|ContentsTitle=Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia
 +
}}
 +
==Abstract==
 +
In this work we study the dynamical features of editorial wars in Wikipedia (WP). Based on our previously established algorithm, we build up samples of controversial and peaceful articles and analyze the temporal characteristics of the activity in these samples. On short time scales, we show that there is a clear correspondence between conflict and burstiness of activity patterns, and that memory effects play an important role in controversies. On long time scales, we identify three distinct developmental patterns for the overall behavior of the articles. We are able to distinguish cases eventually leading to consensus from those cases where a compromise is far from achievable. Finally, we analyze discussion networks and conclude that edit wars are mainly fought by few editors only
 +
 
[[Category:Wikipedia]]
 
[[Category:Wikipedia]]
 +
[[Category:WpPages]]
 
[[Category:Doc]]
 
[[Category:Doc]]

Revision as of 06:24, 24 June 2012

Template:FileProv

Abstract

In this work we study the dynamical features of editorial wars in Wikipedia (WP). Based on our previously established algorithm, we build up samples of controversial and peaceful articles and analyze the temporal characteristics of the activity in these samples. On short time scales, we show that there is a clear correspondence between conflict and burstiness of activity patterns, and that memory effects play an important role in controversies. On long time scales, we identify three distinct developmental patterns for the overall behavior of the articles. We are able to distinguish cases eventually leading to consensus from those cases where a compromise is far from achievable. Finally, we analyze discussion networks and conclude that edit wars are mainly fought by few editors only

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current06:07, 24 June 2012 (922 KB)Peter (talk | contribs)Category:Wikipedia Category:Doc
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.