Difference between revisions of "9-11/WTC7/Destruction"
(Created page with '{{Priority}} ==External Links== *[http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20100527162010811 Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight - David Ray Griffin]') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Priority}} | {{Priority}} | ||
| + | [[File:Wtc7.jpg|thumb|150px|World Trade Centre Building No 7, NYC]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Until recently, few people had seen video footage showing the collapse of the 47-storey WTC building seven.''' But the event was recorded from several different angles by the major US news networks. As evidenced by masses of video footage <ref>[http://www.911truth.dk/first/en/keypoints.htm Watch the building collapse]</ref> the collapse is clearly a controlled demolition, and an extremely professional one at that. Nothing else can explain the perfectly symmetrical collapse, at free-fall speed, into its own footprint. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why was it demolished and who planted the explosives? Why do the FEMA and NIST reports try to explain the collapse based purely on impact damage from tower debris and randomly distributed fires? These effects would have weakened the supporting columns asymmetrically and, assuming sufficient damage - a BIG assumption, that asymmetry would have caused substantial tipping during collapse. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Reports of the collapse== | ||
| + | At 4:57 EST, BBC NYC correspondent Jane Standley, in conversation with a colleague in the London Studio, reported that the building had collapsed. The 'collapse' was headlined in the 5:00pm new roundups of both the BBC and US TV channels. The video of her report has her framed against a large window with a view of the smoking WTC site in the background and building 7 (which she was reporting no longer existed) clearly and prominently visible in the background. <ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s&feature=player_embedded BBC report of the collapse of WTC 7 with the building clearly visible to the left of her head]</ref> The live video feed was severed whilst on-air at 5:15pm and the building collapsed shortly thereafter at 5:21pm | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
*[http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20100527162010811 Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight - David Ray Griffin] | *[http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20100527162010811 Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight - David Ray Griffin] | ||
Revision as of 18:56, 30 May 2010
though be advised that the official narrative is particularly suspect.
Until recently, few people had seen video footage showing the collapse of the 47-storey WTC building seven. But the event was recorded from several different angles by the major US news networks. As evidenced by masses of video footage [1] the collapse is clearly a controlled demolition, and an extremely professional one at that. Nothing else can explain the perfectly symmetrical collapse, at free-fall speed, into its own footprint.
Why was it demolished and who planted the explosives? Why do the FEMA and NIST reports try to explain the collapse based purely on impact damage from tower debris and randomly distributed fires? These effects would have weakened the supporting columns asymmetrically and, assuming sufficient damage - a BIG assumption, that asymmetry would have caused substantial tipping during collapse.
Reports of the collapse
At 4:57 EST, BBC NYC correspondent Jane Standley, in conversation with a colleague in the London Studio, reported that the building had collapsed. The 'collapse' was headlined in the 5:00pm new roundups of both the BBC and US TV channels. The video of her report has her framed against a large window with a view of the smoking WTC site in the background and building 7 (which she was reporting no longer existed) clearly and prominently visible in the background. [2] The live video feed was severed whilst on-air at 5:15pm and the building collapsed shortly thereafter at 5:21pm
