2005 London bombings

From Wikispooks
Revision as of 19:16, 17 May 2010 by Peter (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
!small.png
This is a priority topic relating to deep politics.  Additions to this page are particularly welcome,
though be advised that the official narrative is particularly suspect.


The 'July 7th Truth Campaign' linked below is among the most comprehensive and reliable sources of information and documents on 7/7. It is nevertheless careful, editorially, to stay firmly on the 'official narrative' side of a very sensitive line between "elements of the State/SIS knew much more about plans for the attack than has been revealed" and "those same elements were somewhere between 'deeply complicit' and the orchestrators of the attacks".

The "July 7th - Alternative Hypotheses" document is an impressive exploration of nine possible hypotheses that, in varying degrees, fit the available evidence of what happened on that day. It is another 7th July Truth Campaign document.

The main Wikipedia article linked below is the subject of the WikiSpooks Project article The Problem with Wikipedia. In other words, whilst the article marshalls copious useful facts and information links, it's basic assumption is that the official narrative of the events of 7th July 2005 is broadly accurate.

Note: Per WikiSpooks editorial policy - contributions to this page should take a much more sceptical view of the official narrative.

Note: the ad-hominem attack on Nick Kollerstrom for alleged 'holocaust denial' in the BBC 'Conspiracy Files' video linked below. This is in addition to a similar ad-hominem on Anthony John Hill (aka Muad' dib) over his video 'Ripple-Effect'. It is clear that, 'When the evidence is shaky, attack the man' - or kill the messenger - is alive and well at the BBC.


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.


Documents


External Links