User talk:Anti post-truth

Welcome to Wikispooks!

We're glad you came. There's lots to do.
The Community portal is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go here. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. Peter P (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2017 (GMT)

I have no wish to alter your prose, and even left the name of the 17 year old girl there (when removing the link to her FaceBook page). You are entitled to put down what you wish. But if you include in an article a mixture of fact, supposition and untruths thereby making the article a 'Post Truth, I think it is reasonable for me to point this out.

Vandalism

This person has made a series of edits to articles that can only be described as vandalism. Either that behaviour stops, or the person should be banned from Wikispooks.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 00:33, 6 February 2017 (GMT)

This is completely untrue. The complainant has put on some articles that contain statements he knows (and I know) are completely untrue, and defame an individual or organisation. I have not altered the article. All I have added is that the article is a post-truth, and explained what this means. If he removes things that he knows to be untrue (or are just supposition), my 'addition' would then be unnecessary. The only 'change' I made to an article he wrote was when he put a link to a 17 year old girls FaceBook page. I removed that link. If he calls this 'vandalism' I suggest he relooks at the definition of the word. User:Anti post-truth (talk)

I have reversed all edits that place the 'post-truth' para at the start of a page. I suggest you remove those 'things you know to be untrue' and edit alleged suppositions accordingly. A wider issue which ought to have been addressed earlier is that Wikispooks is not a platform for 'parish-pump politics'. --Peter P (talk) 09:39, 6 February 2017 (GMT)