Difference between revisions of "Talk:John Ashton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→First person commentary: reply) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi Patrick - and thanks for all the solid stuff you are contributing. There is no problem with knowledgeable people arguing relevant thesis at length. However, in the spirit of a reference work, it is preferable that any grammatically first person text be clearly attributed and deliniated. I've taken the liberty of doing that on this article. Please feel free to make further changes. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 07:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | Hi Patrick - and thanks for all the solid stuff you are contributing. There is no problem with knowledgeable people arguing relevant thesis at length. However, in the spirit of a reference work, it is preferable that any grammatically first person text be clearly attributed and deliniated. I've taken the liberty of doing that on this article. Please feel free to make further changes. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 07:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Sorry for the confusion [[User:Peter|Peter P]]. The first person text was not mine: it was from the blogger 'baz' (aka Barry Walker) as is referenced [http://edsblogcity.blogspot.co.uk/2009/10/blog-post.html?showComment=1259764729818#c1908785357458437719 here]. I'm therefore clarifying this point in the article. [[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] 12:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | + | :Sorry for the confusion [[User:Peter|Peter P]]. The first person text was not mine: it was from the blogger 'baz' (aka [[Barry Walker]]) as is referenced [http://edsblogcity.blogspot.co.uk/2009/10/blog-post.html?showComment=1259764729818#c1908785357458437719 here]. I'm therefore clarifying this point in the article. [[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] 12:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC) |
::Oops - my mistake - I've corrected it and made the quote clear --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 13:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ::Oops - my mistake - I've corrected it and made the quote clear --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 13:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:17, 1 November 2013
First person commentary
Hi Patrick - and thanks for all the solid stuff you are contributing. There is no problem with knowledgeable people arguing relevant thesis at length. However, in the spirit of a reference work, it is preferable that any grammatically first person text be clearly attributed and deliniated. I've taken the liberty of doing that on this article. Please feel free to make further changes. --Peter P 07:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for the confusion Peter P. The first person text was not mine: it was from the blogger 'baz' (aka Barry Walker) as is referenced here. I'm therefore clarifying this point in the article. Patrick Haseldine 12:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oops - my mistake - I've corrected it and made the quote clear --Peter P 13:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
