Difference between revisions of "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds"
(Quantifying and valuing) |
(Reverting to an edited [http://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=The_Case_of_the_Disappearing_Diamonds&oldid=17453 25 July 2013 version]) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | '''The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds''' is a Granada TV ''World In Action'' documentary film which reported on how billions of pounds-worth of gem diamonds were stripped from South-West Africa (Namibia) over a 20-year period by [[De Beers]], the world's largest diamond mining company. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds''' is a | ||
− | [[Bernt Carlsson#Highest profile Pan Am Flight 103 victim|The highest profile victim of Pan Am Flight 103]], Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and UN Commissioner for Namibia, [[Bernt Carlsson]], was interviewed in Part 3,<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHIDaGrIsmY | + | The 30-minute film was broadcast by Thames Television on 28 September 1987.<ref>[http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/402661?view=transmission "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds"] ''World In Action'' documentary film, 28 September 1987</ref> |
+ | [[File:Disappearing_Diamonds.jpg|300px|right|thumb|How [[De Beers]] were illegally exploiting billions of pounds-worth of Namibia's diamond gemstones]] | ||
+ | [[File:Bernt_Carlsson_3.jpg|300px|thumb|left|UN Commissioner for Namibia, [[Bernt Carlsson]], threatening to prosecute [[De Beers]] and others]] | ||
+ | A digitised version of "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" video cassette recording is on ''YouTube'' in four parts: | ||
+ | * [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm7DTCWzRaw Part 1] | ||
+ | * [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEPRVKOn7CI Part 2] | ||
+ | * [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHIDaGrIsmY Part 3] | ||
+ | * [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2t3gfF9Hicg Part 4] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Bernt Carlsson#Highest profile Pan Am Flight 103 victim|The highest profile victim of Pan Am Flight 103]], Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and UN Commissioner for Namibia, [[Bernt Carlsson]], was interviewed in Part 3, and threatened to prosecute "all the companies which are carrying out activities in Namibia which have not been authorised by the United Nations."<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHIDaGrIsmY "Bernt Carlsson and The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds, Part 3"]</ref> | ||
==Narrative== | ==Narrative== | ||
− | After the First World War, Ernest Oppenheimer held the monopoly over the mining and sale of South West African diamonds, and formed Consolidated Diamond Mines (CDM) which was owned by De Beers. The voice-over narration by [[John Coates]] begins: | + | After the First World War, Ernest Oppenheimer held the monopoly over the mining and sale of South West African diamonds, and formed Consolidated Diamond Mines (CDM) which was owned by [[De Beers]]. The voice-over narration by [[John Coates]] begins: |
:Tonight we report on the dark side of the diamond industry. We show how one of the world's richest companies has been stripping one of the world's poorest nations of its main asset - diamonds from this mine. Namibia - a forgotten country long denied its independence. Here for 20 years, South Africa has ignored international law, occupied the land by force and refused to allow the formation of a democratic government. Behind the cover of a military occupation, Namibia has been robbed of its mineral wealth. Here a mining company has leased the world's largest diamond workings, taken £5 billion-worth of gems and paid a rent of £130 per year. At the mouth of the Orange River, an accident of geology and the sands of time has laid down one of nature's rarest gifts to mankind - lonely beaches encrusted with the finest gem diamonds in the world. Released by volcanic activity inland, the diamonds were originally thrown into the Orange River, then over the centuries they were washed downstream and taken to the sea. Incoming tides put the finishing touches bringing the diamonds ashore. | :Tonight we report on the dark side of the diamond industry. We show how one of the world's richest companies has been stripping one of the world's poorest nations of its main asset - diamonds from this mine. Namibia - a forgotten country long denied its independence. Here for 20 years, South Africa has ignored international law, occupied the land by force and refused to allow the formation of a democratic government. Behind the cover of a military occupation, Namibia has been robbed of its mineral wealth. Here a mining company has leased the world's largest diamond workings, taken £5 billion-worth of gems and paid a rent of £130 per year. At the mouth of the Orange River, an accident of geology and the sands of time has laid down one of nature's rarest gifts to mankind - lonely beaches encrusted with the finest gem diamonds in the world. Released by volcanic activity inland, the diamonds were originally thrown into the Orange River, then over the centuries they were washed downstream and taken to the sea. Incoming tides put the finishing touches bringing the diamonds ashore. | ||
Line 34: | Line 29: | ||
:"Namibia's economy is extremely sick - the government consumes 75% of GDP to run the country which, today, is the second most indebted country on the African continent - from a debt-free nation seven years ago. The situation in Namibia could become far more serious than Angola and Mozambique. Without international aid, Namibia could turn into the Ethiopia of Southern Africa." | :"Namibia's economy is extremely sick - the government consumes 75% of GDP to run the country which, today, is the second most indebted country on the African continent - from a debt-free nation seven years ago. The situation in Namibia could become far more serious than Angola and Mozambique. Without international aid, Namibia could turn into the Ethiopia of Southern Africa." | ||
− | ===Gordon Brown=== | + | ===[[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]]=== |
− | Former CDM manager, [[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]], claimed that for 20 years De Beers had been stripping Namibia of its most precious asset - diamonds at Oranjemund.<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/thedossier.html "The Dossier"]</ref> | + | Former CDM manager, [[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]], claimed that for 20 years [[De Beers]] had been stripping Namibia of its most precious asset - diamonds at Oranjemund.<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/thedossier.html "The Dossier"]</ref> |
:"Overmining took place on the upper terraces and the 'N' blocks [in the upper terraces, blocks K, L, and M were rich in diamonds and the richest of all were the 'N' blocks] which were the series of beaches situated furthest from the sea. That's where the richest blocks were in terms of grade and stone size. There was a central block between the two major beaches that was of lower grade. That was left behind - the company concentrated on taking out the ore reserves furthest from the sea. That's not good mining practice. Proper mining practice calls for the average ore reserve grade and average stone size. I would liken this to a nice big cream cake, with a sponge cake below. Normally you would take out a slice at a time, but in the case of overmining the cream is completely scraped off the top." | :"Overmining took place on the upper terraces and the 'N' blocks [in the upper terraces, blocks K, L, and M were rich in diamonds and the richest of all were the 'N' blocks] which were the series of beaches situated furthest from the sea. That's where the richest blocks were in terms of grade and stone size. There was a central block between the two major beaches that was of lower grade. That was left behind - the company concentrated on taking out the ore reserves furthest from the sea. That's not good mining practice. Proper mining practice calls for the average ore reserve grade and average stone size. I would liken this to a nice big cream cake, with a sponge cake below. Normally you would take out a slice at a time, but in the case of overmining the cream is completely scraped off the top." | ||
Line 42: | Line 37: | ||
===[[Bernt Carlsson]]=== | ===[[Bernt Carlsson]]=== | ||
− | The man responsible for Namibia under international law, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and UN Commissioner for Namibia, [[Bernt Carlsson]], was asked about Namibia's diamonds: | + | The man responsible for Namibia under international law, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and UN Commissioner for Namibia, [[Bernt Carlsson]], was asked about the exploitation of Namibia's diamonds: |
− | :"The corporation has been trying to skim the cream which means they have gone for the large diamonds at the expense of the steady pace. In this way they have really shortened the lifespan of the mines. One would expect from a worldwide corporation like De Beers and Anglo American that they would behave with an element of social and political responsibility. But their behaviour in the specific case of Namibia has been one of profit maximation regardless of its social, economic, political and even legal responsibility." | + | :"The corporation has been trying to skim the cream which means they have gone for the large diamonds at the expense of the steady pace. In this way they have really shortened the lifespan of the mines. One would expect from a worldwide corporation like [[De Beers]] and Anglo American that they would behave with an element of social and political responsibility. But their behaviour in the specific case of Namibia has been one of profit maximation regardless of its social, economic, political and even legal responsibility." |
[[File:Bernt_Carlsson_2.jpg|300px|thumb|right|[[Bernt Carlsson]] laying down the law about Namibia]] | [[File:Bernt_Carlsson_2.jpg|300px|thumb|right|[[Bernt Carlsson]] laying down the law about Namibia]] | ||
− | The United Nations Council for Namibia enacted in 1974 a Decree for the Protection of the Natural Resources of Namibia, under which no person or entity could search for, take or distribute any natural resources found in Namibia without the Council's permission. Any person or entity contravening the Decree could be held liable for damages by the future government of an independent Namibia.<ref>[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/past/untagS.htm "Historical background - UNCN"]</ref> Companies like De Beers have ignored the law but now attitudes at the UN are beginning to harden: | + | The United Nations Council for Namibia enacted in 1974 a Decree for the Protection of the Natural Resources of Namibia, under which no person or entity could search for, take or distribute any natural resources found in Namibia without the Council's permission. Any person or entity contravening the Decree could be held liable for damages by the future government of an independent Namibia.<ref>[http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/past/untagS.htm "Historical background - UNCN"]</ref> Companies like [[De Beers]] have ignored the law but now attitudes at the UN are beginning to harden: |
:"The United Nations this year [1987] in July started legal action against one such company - the Dutch company URENCO which imports uranium."<ref>[http://www.questia.com/library/1G1-6272039/council-for-namibia-sues-netherlands-over-namibia-s "Council for Namibia sues Netherlands over Namibia's natural resources"]</ref> | :"The United Nations this year [1987] in July started legal action against one such company - the Dutch company URENCO which imports uranium."<ref>[http://www.questia.com/library/1G1-6272039/council-for-namibia-sues-netherlands-over-namibia-s "Council for Namibia sues Netherlands over Namibia's natural resources"]</ref> | ||
[[John Coates]]: Will you be taking action against other companies such as De Beers? | [[John Coates]]: Will you be taking action against other companies such as De Beers? | ||
Line 55: | Line 50: | ||
* at another, the state leased the mining rights to a businessman at £1,500 per year, who then reassigned them for an income of £650,000 per year; | * at another, the state leased the mining rights to a businessman at £1,500 per year, who then reassigned them for an income of £650,000 per year; | ||
* at the British owned Tsumeb mine, lead and copper were exported with undisclosed amounts of gold and silver; | * at the British owned Tsumeb mine, lead and copper were exported with undisclosed amounts of gold and silver; | ||
− | * and the British South West Africa Company exported £7 million-worth of minerals without paying tax. | + | * and the British South-West Africa Company exported £7 million-worth of minerals without paying tax. |
Judge Thirion focused upon the stewardship of the nation's principal economic resource - gem diamonds of the Atlantic beaches north of the Orange River. The Thirion Report's main findings were: | Judge Thirion focused upon the stewardship of the nation's principal economic resource - gem diamonds of the Atlantic beaches north of the Orange River. The Thirion Report's main findings were: | ||
# There were no meaningful controls over Namibia's most important industry; | # There were no meaningful controls over Namibia's most important industry; | ||
− | # The premises of the supposedly independent Diamond Board for South West Africa were provided by De Beers; | + | # The premises of the supposedly independent Diamond Board for South-West Africa were provided by [[De Beers]]; |
− | # All of the Board's agents were De Beers' employees; | + | # All of the Board's agents were [[De Beers]]' employees; |
− | # The entire costs of running the Board were met by De Beers as a tax deductible expense; | + | # The entire costs of running the Board were met by [[De Beers]] as a tax deductible expense; |
− | # Stanley Jackson, the Diamond Board Secretary, was also Secretary to Consolidated Diamond Mines. | + | # Stanley Jackson, the Diamond Board Secretary, was also Secretary to Consolidated Diamond Mines. |
− | The 350-page report found that De Beers had overmined the diamond reserves ahead of Namibia's independence: | + | The 350-page report found that [[De Beers]] had overmined the diamond reserves ahead of Namibia's independence: |
The excessive depletion of the deposit was a preferential depletion of the more valuable deposits to the detriment of the low grade deposits, and therefore a breach of the provisions of Clause 3 of the Halbscheid Agreement. The probabilities are that the effect of the excessive depletion of the deposit will be to shorten the life of the mine and to detrimentally affect its profitability towards the end of its life.<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/pamphlet.html "The Thirion Report"]</ref> | The excessive depletion of the deposit was a preferential depletion of the more valuable deposits to the detriment of the low grade deposits, and therefore a breach of the provisions of Clause 3 of the Halbscheid Agreement. The probabilities are that the effect of the excessive depletion of the deposit will be to shorten the life of the mine and to detrimentally affect its profitability towards the end of its life.<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/pamphlet.html "The Thirion Report"]</ref> | ||
Line 79: | Line 74: | ||
==Diamonds Are Not Forever== | ==Diamonds Are Not Forever== | ||
− | [[File:Gordon_Brown.jpg| | + | [[File:Gordon_Brown.jpg|260px|right|thumb|[[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]] former CDM manager]] |
− | [[File:Carlsson_letter_19_Nov_1987.jpg| | + | [[File:Carlsson_letter_19_Nov_1987.jpg|260px|right|thumb|[[Bernt Carlsson]]'s reply to [[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]] ]] |
− | One month after "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" was broadcast on British television, former Consolidated Diamond Mines manager, [[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]], who was interviewed in the film, wrote from Cape Town to [[Bernt Carlsson]] in New York offering his expert assistance in building the prosecution case against [ | + | One month after "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" was broadcast on British television, former Consolidated Diamond Mines manager, [[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]], who was interviewed in the film, wrote from Cape Town to [[Bernt Carlsson]] in New York offering his expert assistance in building the prosecution case against [[De Beers]] for overmining Namibia's diamond gemstones. In his letter, [[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]] had calculated the quantum and value of diamonds illegally removed from Namibia from 1967, when South-West Africa became the responsibility of the United Nations, until the territory was likely to become independent in 1989/90. By which time, De Beers/Anglo American and the Apartheid State would have illegally removed: |
* 44 million Diamonds, weighing | * 44 million Diamonds, weighing |
Revision as of 11:33, 30 July 2013
The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds is a Granada TV World In Action documentary film which reported on how billions of pounds-worth of gem diamonds were stripped from South-West Africa (Namibia) over a 20-year period by De Beers, the world's largest diamond mining company.
The 30-minute film was broadcast by Thames Television on 28 September 1987.[1]
A digitised version of "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" video cassette recording is on YouTube in four parts:
The highest profile victim of Pan Am Flight 103, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and UN Commissioner for Namibia, Bernt Carlsson, was interviewed in Part 3, and threatened to prosecute "all the companies which are carrying out activities in Namibia which have not been authorised by the United Nations."[2]
Contents
Narrative
After the First World War, Ernest Oppenheimer held the monopoly over the mining and sale of South West African diamonds, and formed Consolidated Diamond Mines (CDM) which was owned by De Beers. The voice-over narration by John Coates begins:
- Tonight we report on the dark side of the diamond industry. We show how one of the world's richest companies has been stripping one of the world's poorest nations of its main asset - diamonds from this mine. Namibia - a forgotten country long denied its independence. Here for 20 years, South Africa has ignored international law, occupied the land by force and refused to allow the formation of a democratic government. Behind the cover of a military occupation, Namibia has been robbed of its mineral wealth. Here a mining company has leased the world's largest diamond workings, taken £5 billion-worth of gems and paid a rent of £130 per year. At the mouth of the Orange River, an accident of geology and the sands of time has laid down one of nature's rarest gifts to mankind - lonely beaches encrusted with the finest gem diamonds in the world. Released by volcanic activity inland, the diamonds were originally thrown into the Orange River, then over the centuries they were washed downstream and taken to the sea. Incoming tides put the finishing touches bringing the diamonds ashore.
Interviewees
In sequence, the following were interviewed in "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds":
Martyn Marriott
Described as a Diamond Consultant, Mr Martyn Marriott, stated:
- "It's well known they're the finest diamonds in the world - the highest quality, best colour, lovely diamonds. They are water-worn, thrown up into the beach and a very nice shape. They just happen to be good quality and good colour as well. The diamonds from Namibia are worth an average $200 per carat whereas the diamonds from Zaïre would be worth $8 per carat."
Eric Lang
Businessman Eric Lang said:
- "Successive Administrator-Generals allowed the mining companies to get away with exporting 20-25% of production without any control whatsoever."
Lang threatened to release Namibia's mineral statistics, to which countries they were being sold and at what prices. Lang said he believes that the plunder of his country's resources could lead to another famine in Africa, and that the people of Namibia had lost their equivalent of North Sea Oil - what would have given them a secure future.
- "Namibia's economy is extremely sick - the government consumes 75% of GDP to run the country which, today, is the second most indebted country on the African continent - from a debt-free nation seven years ago. The situation in Namibia could become far more serious than Angola and Mozambique. Without international aid, Namibia could turn into the Ethiopia of Southern Africa."
Gordon Brown
Former CDM manager, Gordon Brown, claimed that for 20 years De Beers had been stripping Namibia of its most precious asset - diamonds at Oranjemund.[3]
- "Overmining took place on the upper terraces and the 'N' blocks [in the upper terraces, blocks K, L, and M were rich in diamonds and the richest of all were the 'N' blocks] which were the series of beaches situated furthest from the sea. That's where the richest blocks were in terms of grade and stone size. There was a central block between the two major beaches that was of lower grade. That was left behind - the company concentrated on taking out the ore reserves furthest from the sea. That's not good mining practice. Proper mining practice calls for the average ore reserve grade and average stone size. I would liken this to a nice big cream cake, with a sponge cake below. Normally you would take out a slice at a time, but in the case of overmining the cream is completely scraped off the top."
John Shaedonhodi
A Namibian and a CDM worker, John Shaedonhodi, said he was concerned that a future independent Namibia would be impoverished.
Bernt Carlsson
The man responsible for Namibia under international law, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and UN Commissioner for Namibia, Bernt Carlsson, was asked about the exploitation of Namibia's diamonds:
- "The corporation has been trying to skim the cream which means they have gone for the large diamonds at the expense of the steady pace. In this way they have really shortened the lifespan of the mines. One would expect from a worldwide corporation like De Beers and Anglo American that they would behave with an element of social and political responsibility. But their behaviour in the specific case of Namibia has been one of profit maximation regardless of its social, economic, political and even legal responsibility."
The United Nations Council for Namibia enacted in 1974 a Decree for the Protection of the Natural Resources of Namibia, under which no person or entity could search for, take or distribute any natural resources found in Namibia without the Council's permission. Any person or entity contravening the Decree could be held liable for damages by the future government of an independent Namibia.[4] Companies like De Beers have ignored the law but now attitudes at the UN are beginning to harden:
- "The United Nations this year [1987] in July started legal action against one such company - the Dutch company URENCO which imports uranium."[5]
John Coates: Will you be taking action against other companies such as De Beers?
- Bernt Carlsson: "All the companies which are carrying out activities in Namibia which have not been authorised by the United Nations are being studied at present."
Thirion Report
The documentary referred to a wide-ranging investigation carried out by South African Judge Pieter Willem Thirion in 1982 into political corruption and the divisive tribal structures imposed on Namibia by the apartheid government. Judge Thirion extended his investigation into the behaviour of multinational mining companies in the former German colony and found:
- at one mine 420,000 tonnes of ore were sent out of the country as "geological samples";
- at another, the state leased the mining rights to a businessman at £1,500 per year, who then reassigned them for an income of £650,000 per year;
- at the British owned Tsumeb mine, lead and copper were exported with undisclosed amounts of gold and silver;
- and the British South-West Africa Company exported £7 million-worth of minerals without paying tax.
Judge Thirion focused upon the stewardship of the nation's principal economic resource - gem diamonds of the Atlantic beaches north of the Orange River. The Thirion Report's main findings were:
- There were no meaningful controls over Namibia's most important industry;
- The premises of the supposedly independent Diamond Board for South-West Africa were provided by De Beers;
- All of the Board's agents were De Beers' employees;
- The entire costs of running the Board were met by De Beers as a tax deductible expense;
- Stanley Jackson, the Diamond Board Secretary, was also Secretary to Consolidated Diamond Mines.
The 350-page report found that De Beers had overmined the diamond reserves ahead of Namibia's independence: The excessive depletion of the deposit was a preferential depletion of the more valuable deposits to the detriment of the low grade deposits, and therefore a breach of the provisions of Clause 3 of the Halbscheid Agreement. The probabilities are that the effect of the excessive depletion of the deposit will be to shorten the life of the mine and to detrimentally affect its profitability towards the end of its life.[6]
Credits
- Camera: Howard Somers;
- Sound: David Woods;
- Film Editors: Oral Ottey, John Rutherford;
- Dubbing Mixer: John Whitworth;
- Production Assistants: Adele McLoughlin, Judith Fraser;
- Investigation by: Laurie Flynn and John Coates;
- Editor: Stuart Prebble;
- Executive Producer: Ray Fitzwalter;
- Granada Television MCMLXXXVII.
Diamonds Are Not Forever
One month after "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" was broadcast on British television, former Consolidated Diamond Mines manager, Gordon Brown, who was interviewed in the film, wrote from Cape Town to Bernt Carlsson in New York offering his expert assistance in building the prosecution case against De Beers for overmining Namibia's diamond gemstones. In his letter, Gordon Brown had calculated the quantum and value of diamonds illegally removed from Namibia from 1967, when South-West Africa became the responsibility of the United Nations, until the territory was likely to become independent in 1989/90. By which time, De Beers/Anglo American and the Apartheid State would have illegally removed:
- 44 million Diamonds, weighing
- 33 million Carats, with an average diamond size of
- 0.75 Carats per Diamond.
Brown estimated the current value of those diamonds amounted to:
- £11.0 billion, ($18.7bn) being Revenue from Diamond Sales (Standard Selling Value)
- £ 3.3 billion, ($ 5.6bn) spent on Working Costs and Capital Expenditure, leaving
- £ 7.7 billion, ($13.1bn) of Working Profit, distributed as follows:
- £ 4.4 billion, ($ 7.5bn) as De Beers/Anglo American’s Profit Share, and
- £ 3.3 billion, ($ 5.6bn) as Apartheid State’s Profit Share through Taxes, Royalties, etc.
Bernt Carlsson replied by letter dated 19 November 1987 (referenced C-4013):
- Dear Mr Brown,
- Thank you for your letter dated 20 October 1987, in which you expressed interest to be of assistance to this Office with regard to the over-exploitation of the Namibian diamonds.
- The United Nations Council for Namibia is still in the process of examining the appropriate action to take in order to halt the over-exploitation and depletion of Namibia's diamond resource. I note with interest your extensive experience in and in-depth knowledge of the diamond industry and CDM activities. We will, therefore, retain your letter on our files and, should the need arise, contact you for assistance in the matter.
- Yours truly,
- Bernt Carlsson
- United Nations Commissioner for Namibia
See also
References
- ↑ "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" World In Action documentary film, 28 September 1987
- ↑ "Bernt Carlsson and The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds, Part 3"
- ↑ "The Dossier"
- ↑ "Historical background - UNCN"
- ↑ "Council for Namibia sues Netherlands over Namibia's natural resources"
- ↑ "The Thirion Report"