Difference between revisions of "User talk:Patrick Haseldine"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Welcome to Wikispooks!: Lots of work in prospect!) |
(→Welcome to Wikispooks!: reply) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Thanks [[User:Peter|Peter]], I can see there is quite a lot of work in prospect! [[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] 11:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC) | :Thanks [[User:Peter|Peter]], I can see there is quite a lot of work in prospect! [[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] 11:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I've just finished reading through your entire user and article pages. There is lot to digest and it is welcome here. I've added the article page to the [[:Category:Whistleblowers|'Whistleblowers']] category. I guess you've discovered that, when you take on the State over a matter deemed 'sensitive' by the guardians of its dirty little secrets, you cannot win - period. Having clearly followed the dictates of concience at the expense of career you have both my admiration and support. FWIW, Wikispooks is my way of dealing with the State's systematic betrayal of the loyalty which it demands (and ultimately enforces - or else) from its citizens. It's a wicked old world we inhabit, but after early retirement and 10 years intense study, it is crystal clear to me that the British State is right up there with most Machiavellian - not to say Orwellian - of them all. It was a painful experience to have to admit to myself that my country was NOT on the side of the goodies and - not excluding 2 x world wars - never had been. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 13:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:56, 10 March 2013
Welcome to Wikispooks!
We're glad you came.
You will probably want to read the help pages.
The page at WikiSpooks:Getting Started should help you get started. Peter P 10:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Peter, I can see there is quite a lot of work in prospect! Patrick Haseldine 11:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- I've just finished reading through your entire user and article pages. There is lot to digest and it is welcome here. I've added the article page to the 'Whistleblowers' category. I guess you've discovered that, when you take on the State over a matter deemed 'sensitive' by the guardians of its dirty little secrets, you cannot win - period. Having clearly followed the dictates of concience at the expense of career you have both my admiration and support. FWIW, Wikispooks is my way of dealing with the State's systematic betrayal of the loyalty which it demands (and ultimately enforces - or else) from its citizens. It's a wicked old world we inhabit, but after early retirement and 10 years intense study, it is crystal clear to me that the British State is right up there with most Machiavellian - not to say Orwellian - of them all. It was a painful experience to have to admit to myself that my country was NOT on the side of the goodies and - not excluding 2 x world wars - never had been. --Peter P 13:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
