Difference between revisions of "2005 London bombings"
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The ''''July 7th Truth Campaign'''' linked below is among the most comprehensive and reliable sources of information and documents on 7/7. In spite of this it is careful to stay firmly on the 'official narrative' side of a very sensitive line between 'elements of the State/SIS knew much more about plans for the attack than has been revealed' and 'those same elements were somewhere between 'deeply complicit' and the orchestrators of the attacks'. | The ''''July 7th Truth Campaign'''' linked below is among the most comprehensive and reliable sources of information and documents on 7/7. In spite of this it is careful to stay firmly on the 'official narrative' side of a very sensitive line between 'elements of the State/SIS knew much more about plans for the attack than has been revealed' and 'those same elements were somewhere between 'deeply complicit' and the orchestrators of the attacks'. | ||
| − | The main Wikipedia article linked below is the subject of the WikiSpooks Project article [[Project:The Problem with Wikipedia|The Problem with Wikipedia]]. In other words, whilst the article marshalls copious useful facts and information links, it's basic assumption is that the official narrative of the events of 7th July 2005 | + | The main Wikipedia article linked below is the subject of the WikiSpooks Project article [[Project:The Problem with Wikipedia|The Problem with Wikipedia]]. In other words, whilst the article marshalls copious useful facts and information links, it's basic assumption is that the official narrative of the events of 7th July 2005 is broadly accurate. |
'''Note:''' Per WikiSpooks [[Project:Editorial Policy|editorial policy]] - contributions to this page should take a much more sceptical view of the official narrative. | '''Note:''' Per WikiSpooks [[Project:Editorial Policy|editorial policy]] - contributions to this page should take a much more sceptical view of the official narrative. | ||
Revision as of 15:20, 17 May 2010
though be advised that the official narrative is particularly suspect.
The 'July 7th Truth Campaign' linked below is among the most comprehensive and reliable sources of information and documents on 7/7. In spite of this it is careful to stay firmly on the 'official narrative' side of a very sensitive line between 'elements of the State/SIS knew much more about plans for the attack than has been revealed' and 'those same elements were somewhere between 'deeply complicit' and the orchestrators of the attacks'.
The main Wikipedia article linked below is the subject of the WikiSpooks Project article The Problem with Wikipedia. In other words, whilst the article marshalls copious useful facts and information links, it's basic assumption is that the official narrative of the events of 7th July 2005 is broadly accurate.
Note: Per WikiSpooks editorial policy - contributions to this page should take a much more sceptical view of the official narrative.
Note: the ad-hominem attack on Nick Kollerstrom for alleged 'holocaust denial' in the BBC 'Conspiracy Files' video linked below. This is in addition to a similar ad-hominem on Anthony John Hill (aka Muad' dib) over his video 'Ripple-Effect'. It is clear that, 'When the evidence is shaky, attack the man' - or kill the messenger - is alive and well at the BBC.
Documents
External Links
- Wikipedia - Main page for the 7th July 2005 London Bombings
- Wikipedia main page for the 21st July 2005 London Bombing attempts
- Probably the most complete reference source and discussion forum for 7/7
- Nick Kollerstrom - Author of 2009 book 'Terror on the Tube'
- Video - BBC Conspiracy Files -v- Ripple Effect
- Video - 'Ripple Effect'
- Early video detailing anomalies and contradictions in the official narrative of 7/7
- Video - Ludicrous Diversion - another good summary of 7/7 anomalies
