Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corporate media"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Thanks to 'Toolbox' for starting this but I felt it need considerable expansion since the whole subject of the MSM is so central to propagation of 'the official narrative' that WikiSpooks seeks to expose as largely fraudulent. | Thanks to 'Toolbox' for starting this but I felt it need considerable expansion since the whole subject of the MSM is so central to propagation of 'the official narrative' that WikiSpooks seeks to expose as largely fraudulent. | ||
| − | I have saved the sources bit of the original article. I feel it is more appropriate to include it in a Project page - possibly 'editorial policy' - to outline WikiSpooks official policy on information sourcing and referencing. It can then be linked to as appropriate. The policy, simply put and like Wikipedia, is to try to source and reference all statements of fact. It is on what constitutes a ' | + | I have saved the sources bit of the original article. I feel it is more appropriate to include it in a Project page - possibly 'editorial policy' - to outline WikiSpooks official policy on information sourcing and referencing. It can then be linked to as appropriate. The policy, simply put and like Wikipedia, is to try to source and reference all statements of fact. It is on what constitutes a credible or 'Notable' source that WikiSpooks necessarily differs. I'll get around to doing it - or at least starting it asap. |
--[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 08:40, 17 July 2010 (IST) | --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 08:40, 17 July 2010 (IST) | ||
Revision as of 07:51, 17 July 2010
Toolbox - original page
Thanks to 'Toolbox' for starting this but I felt it need considerable expansion since the whole subject of the MSM is so central to propagation of 'the official narrative' that WikiSpooks seeks to expose as largely fraudulent.
I have saved the sources bit of the original article. I feel it is more appropriate to include it in a Project page - possibly 'editorial policy' - to outline WikiSpooks official policy on information sourcing and referencing. It can then be linked to as appropriate. The policy, simply put and like Wikipedia, is to try to source and reference all statements of fact. It is on what constitutes a credible or 'Notable' source that WikiSpooks necessarily differs. I'll get around to doing it - or at least starting it asap.
--Peter P 08:40, 17 July 2010 (IST)
