Difference between revisions of "Birmingham Six"
m (1 revision) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''The Birmingham Six''' | + | '''The Birmingham Six''': six men — Hugh Callaghan, Patrick Joseph Hill, Gerard Hunter, Richard McIlkenny, William Power and John Walker—sentenced to life imprisonment in 1975 in the UK for their alleged parts in carrying out the [[Birmingham pub bombings]]. Their convictions were declared unsafe and overturned by the Court of Appeal on 14 March 1991. They were later awarded compensation ranging from £840,000 to £1.2 million. |
==Birmingham pub bombings== | ==Birmingham pub bombings== | ||
| − | The [[Birmingham pub bombings]] took place on 21 November 1974 and were attributed to the [[Provisional IRA]].<ref>Although the IRA denied that it was involved in the bombings two days after the event, and the IRA has never formally admitted responsibility | + | The [[Birmingham pub bombings]] took place on 21 November 1974 and were attributed to the [[Provisional IRA]].<ref>Although the IRA denied that it was involved in the bombings two days after the event, and the IRA has never formally admitted responsibility, in 1985 a former IRA chief of staff, Joe Cahill, did acknowledge the IRA's role, and 30 years after the bombings [[Gerry Adams]], president of [[Sinn Féin]], expressed his regrets about the huge loss of life and the injuries inflicted (Chrisafis, Angelique. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Northern_Ireland/Story/0,,1356601,00.html IRA fails to say sorry for Birmingham pub bombs], ''[[The Guardian]]'' 22 November 2004, Staff. |
| − | [http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/2004/11/22/story492924770.asp Adams expresses regret for Birmingham pub bombings] ''[[Irish Examiner]]'' 22 November 2004)</ref> The devices were placed in two central Birmingham pubs: the Mulberry Bush | + | [http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/2004/11/22/story492924770.asp Adams expresses regret for Birmingham pub bombings] ''[[Irish Examiner]]'' 22 November 2004)</ref> The devices were placed in two central Birmingham pubs: the Mulberry Bush at the foot of the Rotunda building, and the Tavern in the Town, a basement pub on New Street. The resulting explosions, at 20:25 and 20:27, were together the most injurious and serious terrorist blasts in the UK to that date; 21 people were killed (ten at the Mulberry Bush and eleven at the Tavern in the Town) and 162 people were injured. A third device, outside a bank on Hagley Road, failed to detonate. |
==Arrests and questioning== | ==Arrests and questioning== | ||
| − | Five of the six men arrested were | + | Five of the six men arrested were Belfast-born Roman Catholics. John Walker was born in Derry. All six had lived in Birmingham since the 1960s. Five of the men, Hill, Hunter, McIlkenny, Power and Walker, had left the city on the early evening of 21 November from New Street Station, shortly before the explosions. They were travelling to Belfast to attend the funeral of [[James McDade]], a [[PIRA]] member who had accidentally killed himself whilst allegedly planting a bomb in Coventry. Hill was also intending to see an aunt in Belfast who was sick and not expected to live. They were seen off from the station by Callaghan. |
| − | When they reached | + | When they reached Heysham they and others were subject to a [[Special Branch]] stop and search. The men did not tell the police of the true purpose of their visit to Belfast, a fact that was later held against them. While the search was in progress the police were informed of the Birmingham bombings. The men agreed to be taken to Morecambe police station for forensic tests. |
| − | On the morning of 22 November, after the forensic tests and routine questioning, the men were transferred to the custody of | + | On the morning of 22 November, after the forensic tests and routine questioning, the men were transferred to the custody of West Midlands Serious Crime Squad police unit. William Power alleged that he was assaulted by members of Birmingham CID.<ref>[http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/events/other/1974/faul76a.htm CAIN: Events: Birmingham Six: Fr. Denis Faul and Fr. Raymond Murray. (n.d; 1975?) The Birmingham Framework: Six innocent men framed for the Birmingham Bombings]</ref> Callaghan was taken into custody on the evening of 22 November. |
==Trial== | ==Trial== | ||
| − | On 12 May 1975 the six men were charged with murder and conspiracy to cause explosions. Three other men, James Kelly, | + | On 12 May 1975 the six men were charged with murder and conspiracy to cause explosions. Three other men, James Kelly, Michael Murray and Michael Sheehan, were charged with conspiracy and Kelly and Sheehan also faced charges of unlawful possession of explosives. |
| − | The trial began on 9 June 1975 in | + | The trial began on 9 June 1975 in Lancaster Castle, before Mr Justice Bridge. After legal arguments, the statements made in November, since repudiated, were deemed admissible as evidence. [[Kenneth Littlejohn#Thomas Watt|Thomas Watt]] provided circumstantial evidence about John Walker's association with IRA members.<ref name=error>p229 Chris Mullin ''Error of Judgement''</ref> |
| − | [[Frank Skuse]] used positive [[Griess test]] results to claim that Hill and Power had handled explosives. Callaghan, Hunter, McIlkenny, and Walker all proved negative. | + | [[Frank Skuse]] used positive [[Griess test]] results to claim that Hill and Power had handled explosives. Callaghan, Hunter, McIlkenny, and Walker all proved negative. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry tests at a later date were negative for Power and contradicted the initial results for Hill. <ref>[http://www.aic.gov.au/conferences/medicine/schurr.pdf 'Expert Witnesses And The Duties Of Disclosure & Impartiality: The Lessons Of The IRA Cases In England'. Beverley Schurr]</ref> Skuse's 99% certainty that Power and Hill had explosives traces on their hands was fundamentally opposed by defence expert Dr Hugh Kenneth Black a Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chemistry and ex-HM Chief Inspector of Explosives at the Home Office. Skuse's evidence was clearly preferred by the trial judge. <ref>R v McIlkenney (1991) 93 Cr.App.R. 287</ref> The jury found the six men guilty of murder and on 15 August 1975 they were sentenced to life terms. |
==Charges against police and prison officers== | ==Charges against police and prison officers== | ||
| − | On 28 November, when the men appeared in court for the second time - having been remanded in custody at | + | On 28 November, when the men appeared in court for the second time - having been remanded in custody at HM Prison Birmingham - all showed bruising and other signs of ill-treatment.<ref>[http://cain.ulster.ac.uk/events/other/1974/faul76.htm CAIN: Events: Birmingham Six: Fr. Denis Faul and Fr. Raymond Murray. (1976) The Birmingham Framework: Six innocent men framed for the Birmingham Bombings]</ref> Fourteen prisoner officers were charged with assault in June 1975, but were all found not guilty at a trial presided over by Mr. Justice Swanwick. The Six pressed charges against the West Midlands police in 1977, which were rejected in the Court of Appeal on 17 January 1980 by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Denning, sitting with Lord Justice Goff and Sir George Baker under Issue Estoppel.<ref>[http://www.portia.org/chapter10/bmpub.html The Birmingham Six: The Appeal] Paragraphs six and seven in the Appeal section. N.B. The web page says: "The following account of The Birmingham Six case was copied from a web site (which later closed) set up for MOJO, the Miscarriages of Justice Organisation formed by Paddy Hill after the convictions were quashed. This case and the treatment of these men is far too important not to be available for all to see."</ref><ref>[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldjudgmt/jd050210/polan-3.htm Judgments - Polanski (Appellant) v. Conde Nast Publications Limited (Respondents)] UK Parliament publications > Business > Lords Publications > Judgment Index > Judgment. Paragraph 86</ref> In his judgment Lord Denning said |
| − | + | <blockquote> | |
| − | </ref><ref>[http://www.portia.org/chapter10/bmpub.html The Birmingham Six: An appalling vista]. The web page says: "The following account of [The Birminghand Six] case was copied from a web site (which later closed) set up for MOJO, the Miscarriages of Justice Organisation formed by Paddy Hill after the convictions were quashed. This case and the treatment of these men is far too important not to be available for all to see."</ref><ref>Stephen Sedley [http://www.guardian.co.uk/obituaries/story/0,,313455,00.html ''A benchmark of British justice''] '' | + | Just consider the course of events if their (the Six's) action were to proceed to trial ... If the six men failed it would mean that much time and money and worry would have been expended by many people to no good purpose. If they won, it would mean that the police were guilty of perjury; that they were guilty of violence and threats; that the confessions were involuntary and improperly admitted in evidence; and that the convictions were erroneous. That would mean that the Home Secretary would have either to recommend that they be pardoned or to remit the case to the Court of Appeal. That was such an appalling vista that every sensible person would say, 'It cannot be right that these actions should go any further.' They should be struck out either on the ground that the men are stopped from challenging the decision of Mr. Justice Bridge, or alternatively that it is an abuse of the process of the court. Whichever it is, the actions should be stopped.<ref>[http://econ.massey.ac.nz/cppe/papers/cppeip03.htm ''The Family Court: A view from the outside''] Issues Paper No. 3 Centre for Public Policy Evaluation, College of Business, Massey University October 1998. See section 2.2.2 Judges' Standards |
| + | </ref><ref>[http://www.portia.org/chapter10/bmpub.html The Birmingham Six: An appalling vista]. The web page says: "The following account of [The Birminghand Six] case was copied from a web site (which later closed) set up for MOJO, the Miscarriages of Justice Organisation formed by Paddy Hill after the convictions were quashed. This case and the treatment of these men is far too important not to be available for all to see."</ref><ref>Stephen Sedley [http://www.guardian.co.uk/obituaries/story/0,,313455,00.html ''A benchmark of British justice''] ''The Guardian'' 6 March 1999. Paragraph 15.</ref> | ||
==Appeals== | ==Appeals== | ||
| − | In March 1976 their first appeal was dismissed by | + | In March 1976 their first appeal was dismissed by Lord Chief Justice John Widgery. <ref>''Miscarriages of Justice''; Bob Woffinden (1987)</ref> |
| − | Journalist (later | + | Journalist (later Government minister) Chris Mullin investigated the case for Granada Television's ''World in Action'' series. In 1985, the first of several ''World in Action'' programmes casting serious doubt on the men's convictions was broadcast. In 1986, Mullin's book, ''Error of Judgment - The Truth About the Birmingham Pub Bombings'', set out a detailed case supporting the men's innocence including his claim to have met with some of those actually responsible for the bombings. Home Secretary Douglas Hurd MP referred the case back to the Court of Appeal. |
| − | In January 1988, after a six week hearing (at that time the longest criminal appeal hearing ever held), the men's convictions were upheld. The appeal judges, under the Lord Chief Justice | + | In January 1988, after a six week hearing (at that time the longest criminal appeal hearing ever held), the men's convictions were upheld. The appeal judges, under the Lord Chief Justice Geoffrey Lane, in their summing up strongly supported the original conviction. Over the next three years newspaper articles, television documentaries and books brought forward new evidence to question the conviction while campaign groups calling for the men's release sprang up across the UK, Ireland, Europe and the USA. |
| − | Their third appeal, in 1991, was successful. Hunter was represented by | + | Their third appeal, in 1991, was successful. Hunter was represented by Lord Gifford QC, others by noted human rights solicitor, Gareth Peirce. New evidence of police fabrication and suppression of evidence, the discrediting of both the confessions and the 1975 forensic evidence led to the Crown withdrawing most of its case against the men. |
The Court of Appeal stated about the forensic evidence that: | The Court of Appeal stated about the forensic evidence that: | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
==Consequences== | ==Consequences== | ||
| − | The collapse of the case and other miscarriages of justice caused the | + | The collapse of the case and other miscarriages of justice caused the Home Secretary to set up a Royal Commission on Criminal Justice in 1991. The commission reported in 1993 and led to the Criminal Appeal Act of 1995 and the establishment of the Criminal Cases Review Commission in 1997. |
| − | + | Superintendent George Reade and two other police officers were charged with perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice but were never brought to trial | |
Richard McIlkenny died in a Dublin hospital on 21 May 2006, following a lengthy battle with cancer. | Richard McIlkenny died in a Dublin hospital on 21 May 2006, following a lengthy battle with cancer. | ||
==''Who Bombed Birmingham?''== | ==''Who Bombed Birmingham?''== | ||
| − | On 28 March 1990, | + | On 28 March 1990, ITV broadcast the Granada Television documentary drama, ''Who Bombed Birmingham?'', which re-enacted the bombings and subsequent key events in Chris Mullin's campaign. Written by Rob Ritchie and directed by Mike Beckham, it starred John Hurt as Mullin, Martin Shaw as ''World in Action'' producer Ian McBride, and Patrick Malahide as Michael Mansfield QC. It was repackaged for export as "The Investigation", and has appeared several times on Canadian television. The award winning ITV documentary "The Birmingham Six: Their Own Story" (tx. 18.03.1991) is available on a DVD produced by Granada Television. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 69: | Line 70: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | + | <references/> | |
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Northern Ireland]] |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 15:17, 29 June 2010
The Birmingham Six: six men — Hugh Callaghan, Patrick Joseph Hill, Gerard Hunter, Richard McIlkenny, William Power and John Walker—sentenced to life imprisonment in 1975 in the UK for their alleged parts in carrying out the Birmingham pub bombings. Their convictions were declared unsafe and overturned by the Court of Appeal on 14 March 1991. They were later awarded compensation ranging from £840,000 to £1.2 million.
Contents
Birmingham pub bombings
The Birmingham pub bombings took place on 21 November 1974 and were attributed to the Provisional IRA.[1] The devices were placed in two central Birmingham pubs: the Mulberry Bush at the foot of the Rotunda building, and the Tavern in the Town, a basement pub on New Street. The resulting explosions, at 20:25 and 20:27, were together the most injurious and serious terrorist blasts in the UK to that date; 21 people were killed (ten at the Mulberry Bush and eleven at the Tavern in the Town) and 162 people were injured. A third device, outside a bank on Hagley Road, failed to detonate.
Arrests and questioning
Five of the six men arrested were Belfast-born Roman Catholics. John Walker was born in Derry. All six had lived in Birmingham since the 1960s. Five of the men, Hill, Hunter, McIlkenny, Power and Walker, had left the city on the early evening of 21 November from New Street Station, shortly before the explosions. They were travelling to Belfast to attend the funeral of James McDade, a PIRA member who had accidentally killed himself whilst allegedly planting a bomb in Coventry. Hill was also intending to see an aunt in Belfast who was sick and not expected to live. They were seen off from the station by Callaghan.
When they reached Heysham they and others were subject to a Special Branch stop and search. The men did not tell the police of the true purpose of their visit to Belfast, a fact that was later held against them. While the search was in progress the police were informed of the Birmingham bombings. The men agreed to be taken to Morecambe police station for forensic tests.
On the morning of 22 November, after the forensic tests and routine questioning, the men were transferred to the custody of West Midlands Serious Crime Squad police unit. William Power alleged that he was assaulted by members of Birmingham CID.[2] Callaghan was taken into custody on the evening of 22 November.
Trial
On 12 May 1975 the six men were charged with murder and conspiracy to cause explosions. Three other men, James Kelly, Michael Murray and Michael Sheehan, were charged with conspiracy and Kelly and Sheehan also faced charges of unlawful possession of explosives.
The trial began on 9 June 1975 in Lancaster Castle, before Mr Justice Bridge. After legal arguments, the statements made in November, since repudiated, were deemed admissible as evidence. Thomas Watt provided circumstantial evidence about John Walker's association with IRA members.[3]
Frank Skuse used positive Griess test results to claim that Hill and Power had handled explosives. Callaghan, Hunter, McIlkenny, and Walker all proved negative. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry tests at a later date were negative for Power and contradicted the initial results for Hill. [4] Skuse's 99% certainty that Power and Hill had explosives traces on their hands was fundamentally opposed by defence expert Dr Hugh Kenneth Black a Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chemistry and ex-HM Chief Inspector of Explosives at the Home Office. Skuse's evidence was clearly preferred by the trial judge. [5] The jury found the six men guilty of murder and on 15 August 1975 they were sentenced to life terms.
Charges against police and prison officers
On 28 November, when the men appeared in court for the second time - having been remanded in custody at HM Prison Birmingham - all showed bruising and other signs of ill-treatment.[6] Fourteen prisoner officers were charged with assault in June 1975, but were all found not guilty at a trial presided over by Mr. Justice Swanwick. The Six pressed charges against the West Midlands police in 1977, which were rejected in the Court of Appeal on 17 January 1980 by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Denning, sitting with Lord Justice Goff and Sir George Baker under Issue Estoppel.[7][8] In his judgment Lord Denning said
Just consider the course of events if their (the Six's) action were to proceed to trial ... If the six men failed it would mean that much time and money and worry would have been expended by many people to no good purpose. If they won, it would mean that the police were guilty of perjury; that they were guilty of violence and threats; that the confessions were involuntary and improperly admitted in evidence; and that the convictions were erroneous. That would mean that the Home Secretary would have either to recommend that they be pardoned or to remit the case to the Court of Appeal. That was such an appalling vista that every sensible person would say, 'It cannot be right that these actions should go any further.' They should be struck out either on the ground that the men are stopped from challenging the decision of Mr. Justice Bridge, or alternatively that it is an abuse of the process of the court. Whichever it is, the actions should be stopped.[9][10][11]
Appeals
In March 1976 their first appeal was dismissed by Lord Chief Justice John Widgery. [12]
Journalist (later Government minister) Chris Mullin investigated the case for Granada Television's World in Action series. In 1985, the first of several World in Action programmes casting serious doubt on the men's convictions was broadcast. In 1986, Mullin's book, Error of Judgment - The Truth About the Birmingham Pub Bombings, set out a detailed case supporting the men's innocence including his claim to have met with some of those actually responsible for the bombings. Home Secretary Douglas Hurd MP referred the case back to the Court of Appeal.
In January 1988, after a six week hearing (at that time the longest criminal appeal hearing ever held), the men's convictions were upheld. The appeal judges, under the Lord Chief Justice Geoffrey Lane, in their summing up strongly supported the original conviction. Over the next three years newspaper articles, television documentaries and books brought forward new evidence to question the conviction while campaign groups calling for the men's release sprang up across the UK, Ireland, Europe and the USA.
Their third appeal, in 1991, was successful. Hunter was represented by Lord Gifford QC, others by noted human rights solicitor, Gareth Peirce. New evidence of police fabrication and suppression of evidence, the discrediting of both the confessions and the 1975 forensic evidence led to the Crown withdrawing most of its case against the men.
The Court of Appeal stated about the forensic evidence that: Dr. Skuse's conclusion was wrong, and demonstrably wrong, judged even by the state of forensic science in 1974.[13]
In 2001, a decade after their release, the six men were awarded compensation ranging from £840,000 to £1.2 million.
Consequences
The collapse of the case and other miscarriages of justice caused the Home Secretary to set up a Royal Commission on Criminal Justice in 1991. The commission reported in 1993 and led to the Criminal Appeal Act of 1995 and the establishment of the Criminal Cases Review Commission in 1997.
Superintendent George Reade and two other police officers were charged with perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice but were never brought to trial
Richard McIlkenny died in a Dublin hospital on 21 May 2006, following a lengthy battle with cancer.
Who Bombed Birmingham?
On 28 March 1990, ITV broadcast the Granada Television documentary drama, Who Bombed Birmingham?, which re-enacted the bombings and subsequent key events in Chris Mullin's campaign. Written by Rob Ritchie and directed by Mike Beckham, it starred John Hurt as Mullin, Martin Shaw as World in Action producer Ian McBride, and Patrick Malahide as Michael Mansfield QC. It was repackaged for export as "The Investigation", and has appeared several times on Canadian television. The award winning ITV documentary "The Birmingham Six: Their Own Story" (tx. 18.03.1991) is available on a DVD produced by Granada Television.
See also
- The Guildford Four and Maguire Seven, two sets of people falsely convicted of bombings carried out by the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) in the 1970s.
- In the Name of the Father, a 1993 film based on the true life story of the Guildford Four.
- Frank Skuse
- Mick Murray
Further reading
- Criminal Cases Review Commission
- House of Commons Debate
- BBC - On This Day
- Birmingham Pub Bombings
- The Birmingham Framework
- Cain Conflict Chronology
- Miscarriages of Justice Organisation
- Birmingham Six
- Error of Judgment: The Truth About the Birmingham Bombings; Chris Mullin
- The Birmingham Six and Other Cases; Louis Blom-Cooper; ISBN 0-7156-2813-5.
- Forever Lost, Forever Gone; Paddy Joe Hill
References
- ↑ Although the IRA denied that it was involved in the bombings two days after the event, and the IRA has never formally admitted responsibility, in 1985 a former IRA chief of staff, Joe Cahill, did acknowledge the IRA's role, and 30 years after the bombings Gerry Adams, president of Sinn Féin, expressed his regrets about the huge loss of life and the injuries inflicted (Chrisafis, Angelique. IRA fails to say sorry for Birmingham pub bombs, The Guardian 22 November 2004, Staff. Adams expresses regret for Birmingham pub bombings Irish Examiner 22 November 2004)
- ↑ CAIN: Events: Birmingham Six: Fr. Denis Faul and Fr. Raymond Murray. (n.d; 1975?) The Birmingham Framework: Six innocent men framed for the Birmingham Bombings
- ↑ p229 Chris Mullin Error of Judgement
- ↑ 'Expert Witnesses And The Duties Of Disclosure & Impartiality: The Lessons Of The IRA Cases In England'. Beverley Schurr
- ↑ R v McIlkenney (1991) 93 Cr.App.R. 287
- ↑ CAIN: Events: Birmingham Six: Fr. Denis Faul and Fr. Raymond Murray. (1976) The Birmingham Framework: Six innocent men framed for the Birmingham Bombings
- ↑ The Birmingham Six: The Appeal Paragraphs six and seven in the Appeal section. N.B. The web page says: "The following account of The Birmingham Six case was copied from a web site (which later closed) set up for MOJO, the Miscarriages of Justice Organisation formed by Paddy Hill after the convictions were quashed. This case and the treatment of these men is far too important not to be available for all to see."
- ↑ Judgments - Polanski (Appellant) v. Conde Nast Publications Limited (Respondents) UK Parliament publications > Business > Lords Publications > Judgment Index > Judgment. Paragraph 86
- ↑ The Family Court: A view from the outside Issues Paper No. 3 Centre for Public Policy Evaluation, College of Business, Massey University October 1998. See section 2.2.2 Judges' Standards
- ↑ The Birmingham Six: An appalling vista. The web page says: "The following account of [The Birminghand Six] case was copied from a web site (which later closed) set up for MOJO, the Miscarriages of Justice Organisation formed by Paddy Hill after the convictions were quashed. This case and the treatment of these men is far too important not to be available for all to see."
- ↑ Stephen Sedley A benchmark of British justice The Guardian 6 March 1999. Paragraph 15.
- ↑ Miscarriages of Justice; Bob Woffinden (1987)
- ↑ R v McIlkenney (1991) 93 Cr.App.R. 53-54
