Difference between revisions of "Talk:Apollo program"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Unfair rating)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
The one star rating on this article seems very unfair. Regardless of one's opinion on the Apollo missions, I feel like this article is objectively one of the most comprehensive, thoroughly researchred and well-written articles on all of Wikispooks. I see no problems with it, much less a problem warranting a rating of one star. I'd even say it's better written than most of the 5-star articles.
+
The one star rating on this article seems very unfair. Regardless of one's opinion on the Apollo missions, I feel like this article is objectively one of the most comprehensive, thoroughly researched and well-written articles on all of Wikispooks. I see no problems with it, much less a problem warranting a rating of one star. I'd even say it's better written than most of the 5-star articles.

Revision as of 06:09, 14 February 2021

The one star rating on this article seems very unfair. Regardless of one's opinion on the Apollo missions, I feel like this article is objectively one of the most comprehensive, thoroughly researched and well-written articles on all of Wikispooks. I see no problems with it, much less a problem warranting a rating of one star. I'd even say it's better written than most of the 5-star articles.