Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia:9/11 conspiracy theories"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Wikispooks comment on the Wikipedia page== | ==Wikispooks comment on the Wikipedia page== | ||
| − | The Wikipedia page does a fairly comprehensive job of listing and summarising the main areas of dissent from the [[Wikispooks:Definitions|'official narrative']] and is thus a useful reference. However it is also notable as an example of the way in which credible dissent is dealt with by MSM where it cannot be simply ignored or ridiculed. In summary, all official narrative dissenting opinion and evidence is, by definition "[[:Category:Conspiracy Theory|Conspiracy Theory]" whereas the official narrative is - just that | + | The Wikipedia page does a fairly comprehensive job of listing and summarising the main areas of dissent from the [[Wikispooks:Definitions|'official narrative']] and is thus a useful reference. However it is also notable as an example of the way in which credible dissent is dealt with by MSM where it cannot be simply ignored or ridiculed. In summary, all official narrative dissenting opinion and evidence is, by definition "[[:Category:Conspiracy Theory|Conspiracy Theory]]" whereas the official narrative is - just that |
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
Revision as of 07:47, 1 July 2011
 9/11 conspiracy theories
|
Related Wikispooks Pages
9/11 - - Wikispooks main page on 9/11. Sparse in content but with useful links and an outline of the Wikispooks approach to the subject 9/11:Israel did it - - Extensive collection of evidence that Israel, Mossad and US citizens with dual US-Israeli citizenship loyal to Zionism, were deeply complicit in the attacks Nuclear Demolition - - Reconstruction of an article which was deleted from Wikipedia soon after it was posted. It concerns the theory of nuclear demolition of tall buildings and argues that the nature of the WTC building collapses is congruent with nuclear demolition
External Links
- Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth - Dedicated web site per the link name
- Pilots for 9/11 Truth - Dedicated web site per the link name.
- 9/11 Truth .org - Dedicated web site per the link name
Wikispooks comment on the Wikipedia page
The Wikipedia page does a fairly comprehensive job of listing and summarising the main areas of dissent from the 'official narrative' and is thus a useful reference. However it is also notable as an example of the way in which credible dissent is dealt with by MSM where it cannot be simply ignored or ridiculed. In summary, all official narrative dissenting opinion and evidence is, by definition "Conspiracy Theory" whereas the official narrative is - just that
See Also
- Category:9/11 - Wikispooks list of articles, documents and files in the "9/11" category
Of particular note are the following:
- 7 Building 7 Problems - Detailed examination of the problems with the official narrative (such as it exists at all) with the collapse of WTC building 7.
- Document:Waging the Battle for Reality - A Review Essay on a Propagandist’s Journey in Search of his so-called ‘Conspiracist Underground’ by Anthony J. Hall Professor of Globalization Studies at the University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Cananda. Originally published by Salem-News.com, 29 May 2011
- Document:The use of terrorism to construct world order - A paper by Norwegian Academic Ola Tunander, presented at the Fifth Pan-European International Relations Conference (Panel 28 Geopolitics) Netherlands Congress Centre, The Hague, 9-11 September 2004
- Document:9/11 Insider Trading - Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11. An article by Kevin Ryan originally published in Foreign Policy Journal 18 November 2010
- Document:Andreas von Buelow - Interview - In terview with Andreas von Buelow published in Tagesspiegel oon 13 January 2002. It is noteworthy because it is an "official narrative" dissenting opinion, from from a former senior member of the German government.
