Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (reply) |
(Tit-bit added to the "Prosecution of crimes" section) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:The reference to Lockerbie and the prosecution of [[Pik Botha]] now removed from the lede.--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 17:04, 24 February 2014 (GMT) | :The reference to Lockerbie and the prosecution of [[Pik Botha]] now removed from the lede.--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 17:04, 24 February 2014 (GMT) | ||
| − | ::Thanks Patrick --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 17:09, 24 February 2014 (GMT) | + | ::Thanks Patrick. However, I can see no objection to that appearing lower down in the page as an interesting tit-bit of info about an important issue facing the page subject. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 17:09, 24 February 2014 (GMT) |
| + | |||
| + | :::Tit-bit added to the "Prosecution of crimes" section.--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 17:54, 24 February 2014 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:54, 24 February 2014
The reference to Lockerbie and the prosecution of Pik Botha does not belong in the Lede. This really is a matter of principle and is applicable to other pages too. Important though Lockerbie is, it is a relatively minor part of the corpus of issues and responsibilities of this page subject. I appreciate Lockerbie assumes a greater importance in the context of Wikispooks' preoccupations but even here it is not the dominant one. --Peter P (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2014 (GMT)
- The reference to Lockerbie and the prosecution of Pik Botha now removed from the lede.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 17:04, 24 February 2014 (GMT)
- Tit-bit added to the "Prosecution of crimes" section.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2014 (GMT)
