Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wilfred"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (message) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:There's so much bad things in the country going on right now and Wikispooks is so important giving people the chance to let it be known. [[User:Wilfred|Wilfred]] 20:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC) | :There's so much bad things in the country going on right now and Wikispooks is so important giving people the chance to let it be known. [[User:Wilfred|Wilfred]] 20:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| − | Wilfred - Thanks for your latest attention to the USS Libery article. It's detailed research and referencing like that that Wikispooks needs. | + | ----- |
| + | |||
| + | Wilfred - Thanks for your latest attention to the USS Libery article. It's detailed research and referencing like that that Wikispooks needs. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 10:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Yes, congratulations, excellent work. I noticed the original of that chart wasn't entirely up to date. When I checked for citations of Bamford's book "Body of Secrets", the link appears to say it's now cited 184 times. Any chance you could look at it or would you like help? [[User:Toolbox|Toolbox]] 18:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:25, 5 December 2011
Thanks for the 'Military Commissions Act' contribution Wilfred. I've taken the liberty of a bit of formatting enhancement and created a Wikipedia+ page such that anyone using the Wikipedia+ browser add-in and landing on the Wikipedia page, will be provided with an automated link to the WP pages.
What Wikispooks needs is a few thousand more such articles and links. Thanks again --Peter P 09:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- There's so much bad things in the country going on right now and Wikispooks is so important giving people the chance to let it be known. Wilfred 20:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Wilfred - Thanks for your latest attention to the USS Libery article. It's detailed research and referencing like that that Wikispooks needs. --Peter P 10:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, congratulations, excellent work. I noticed the original of that chart wasn't entirely up to date. When I checked for citations of Bamford's book "Body of Secrets", the link appears to say it's now cited 184 times. Any chance you could look at it or would you like help? Toolbox 18:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
