Difference between revisions of "9-11"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{9/11 rules}}
 
{{9/11 rules}}
  
 +
Nine years after the events, dissent from the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is framed, less and less as "conspiracy theory" and increasingly as legitimate mainstream controversy.  This is because reasonable questions, arising from both glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report together with subsequent peer-reviewed scientific evidence, are routinely stone-walled as somehow 'unpatriotic' by the US authorities who simply refuse to address, let alone answer any of them. The tactic is wearing very thin indeed and, absent another such 'catastrophic and catalyzing event', <ref>[https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf PNAC Rebuilding America's Defences. Page 51]</ref> it surely cannot continue for much longer.
  
===This is the main page covering the events of 11 September 2001 in the USA.===
+
<big>'''This is the main page covering the events of 11 September 2001 in the USA.'''</big>
 
{{Add}}
 
{{Add}}
  
Line 19: Line 20:
 
*[[Document:General Hamid Gul - Interview|2001 Interview with General Hamid Gul - former DG of the Pakistan ISI Intelligence Agency]]
 
*[[Document:General Hamid Gul - Interview|2001 Interview with General Hamid Gul - former DG of the Pakistan ISI Intelligence Agency]]
 
*[[File:UNDERSTANDING 911 and 911 wars.doc]] - An essay by Emeritus Professor John McMurtry of Delph University  
 
*[[File:UNDERSTANDING 911 and 911 wars.doc]] - An essay by Emeritus Professor John McMurtry of Delph University  
 +
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
  
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==

Revision as of 17:23, 22 September 2010

Template:9/11 rules

Nine years after the events, dissent from the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is framed, less and less as "conspiracy theory" and increasingly as legitimate mainstream controversy. This is because reasonable questions, arising from both glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report together with subsequent peer-reviewed scientific evidence, are routinely stone-walled as somehow 'unpatriotic' by the US authorities who simply refuse to address, let alone answer any of them. The tactic is wearing very thin indeed and, absent another such 'catastrophic and catalyzing event', [1] it surely cannot continue for much longer.

This is the main page covering the events of 11 September 2001 in the USA. Template:Add

Subsidiary 9/11 articles

See Also

References

External Links


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.