Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dreyfus Affair"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "What's the point of this article, which looks as if it's simply been lifted from the other place? ~~~~") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What's the point of this article, which looks as if it's simply been lifted from the other place? [[User:Toolbox|Toolbox]] 20:56, 9 August 2010 (IST) | What's the point of this article, which looks as if it's simply been lifted from the other place? [[User:Toolbox|Toolbox]] 20:56, 9 August 2010 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Quite a lot of stuff here has been initially lifted from 'the other place' (and other sources). It's a useful way to get started with a topic, usually as a prelude (where clearly necessary to reflect WikiSpooks editorial policy) to re-balancing it. The Dreyfus affair does have clear 'Deep Political' associations and, as such, I for one judge it an appropriate subject to be on the site. Maybe it needs further tweeking. I haven't had time to vet it thoroughly but do know something of the user who posted it - and she has serious deep politics research credentials. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 09:55, 10 August 2010 (IST) | ||
Revision as of 08:55, 10 August 2010
What's the point of this article, which looks as if it's simply been lifted from the other place? Toolbox 20:56, 9 August 2010 (IST)
- Quite a lot of stuff here has been initially lifted from 'the other place' (and other sources). It's a useful way to get started with a topic, usually as a prelude (where clearly necessary to reflect WikiSpooks editorial policy) to re-balancing it. The Dreyfus affair does have clear 'Deep Political' associations and, as such, I for one judge it an appropriate subject to be on the site. Maybe it needs further tweeking. I haven't had time to vet it thoroughly but do know something of the user who posted it - and she has serious deep politics research credentials. --Peter P 09:55, 10 August 2010 (IST)
