Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks talk:Terms of Service"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(add item) |
m (typo) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==System use== | ==System use== | ||
From memory I think there is a system parameter that defaults to this page. Its in the messages database system too as I recall, so not so easily messed with. There are legal implications IOW. It should either be redirected to a single more useful page or edited to include relevant missing stuff. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:46, 12 December 2013 (GMT) | From memory I think there is a system parameter that defaults to this page. Its in the messages database system too as I recall, so not so easily messed with. There are legal implications IOW. It should either be redirected to a single more useful page or edited to include relevant missing stuff. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:46, 12 December 2013 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The registration process links to the page through the system messages table so best not to delete it. Also, the nominated for deletion banner is off-putting for anyone in the middle of registering. I have therefore removed it. However, I do agrre it could be made more useful than it is at present. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:07, 1 May 2014 (IST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:08, 1 May 2014
System use
From memory I think there is a system parameter that defaults to this page. Its in the messages database system too as I recall, so not so easily messed with. There are legal implications IOW. It should either be redirected to a single more useful page or edited to include relevant missing stuff. --Peter P (talk) 07:46, 12 December 2013 (GMT)
- The registration process links to the page through the system messages table so best not to delete it. Also, the nominated for deletion banner is off-putting for anyone in the middle of registering. I have therefore removed it. However, I do agrre it could be made more useful than it is at present. --Peter P (talk) 07:07, 1 May 2014 (IST)
