Difference between revisions of "Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack"
m (add property) |
m (external links) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
On January 29th, 2013, the UK newspaper ''The Daily Mail'' published a story entitled "[http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/28/israeli-intelligence-intercepted-syria-chemical-talk U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime']". This was based on evidence provided by an unnamed Malaysian hacker, which began "Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country." The story was removed on January 31st and the newspaper ran an apology on the 18th April which stated that they had paid money to [[Britam Defence Ltd]] and that they no longer believed the email authentic.<ref name="dailymail2013">http://web.archive.org/web/20130130091742/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html</ref> | On January 29th, 2013, the UK newspaper ''The Daily Mail'' published a story entitled "[http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/28/israeli-intelligence-intercepted-syria-chemical-talk U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime']". This was based on evidence provided by an unnamed Malaysian hacker, which began "Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country." The story was removed on January 31st and the newspaper ran an apology on the 18th April which stated that they had paid money to [[Britam Defence Ltd]] and that they no longer believed the email authentic.<ref name="dailymail2013">http://web.archive.org/web/20130130091742/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==External Links== | ||
| + | *[http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin Whose sarin?] - Seymour Hersh. London Review of Books 19 December 2013 | ||
| + | *[http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/alerts-2013/751-an-awkward-silence-burying-the-hersh-revelations-of-obama-s-syrian-deceit.html An Awkward Silence - Burying The Hersh Revelations Of Obama’s Syrian Deceit] - Medie Lens 17 December 2013 | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 18:50, 18 December 2013
The 2013 Ghouta attacks were a series of alleged chemical warfare attacks that occurred on Wednesday, 21 August 2013, in the Ghouta region of Syria. Hundreds of people died, thousands were injured.
False Flag Suspicions
Ron Paul was reported on August 31st, 2013 as saying about the attack "I think it’s a false flag".[1]
Britam Defence Leak
On January 29th, 2013, the UK newspaper The Daily Mail published a story entitled "U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'". This was based on evidence provided by an unnamed Malaysian hacker, which began "Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country." The story was removed on January 31st and the newspaper ran an apology on the 18th April which stated that they had paid money to Britam Defence Ltd and that they no longer believed the email authentic.[2]
External Links
- Whose sarin? - Seymour Hersh. London Review of Books 19 December 2013
- An Awkward Silence - Burying The Hersh Revelations Of Obama’s Syrian Deceit - Medie Lens 17 December 2013
