Difference between revisions of "User talk:Chris"
m (typos) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Judging by your contributions to date (5 single para articles in 24 hours!), your understanding of what Wikispooks is about falls short of what is required. Sorry to be so blunt but that's the way it appears. The site is not a suitable home for sensational, unreferenced assertions stated as fact. I have deleted all of them and converted a couple to stub pages since their titles are suitable WS subjects. I suggest you spend some time studying the project pages before making further contributions. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 07:18, 2 September 2012 (IST) | Judging by your contributions to date (5 single para articles in 24 hours!), your understanding of what Wikispooks is about falls short of what is required. Sorry to be so blunt but that's the way it appears. The site is not a suitable home for sensational, unreferenced assertions stated as fact. I have deleted all of them and converted a couple to stub pages since their titles are suitable WS subjects. I suggest you spend some time studying the project pages before making further contributions. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 07:18, 2 September 2012 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for your advice Peter. Sorry to hear you value Life and Truth so cheaply. Since when was the CIA Research at Stanford unreferenced! You have shown your true colors, better Luck next incarnation? | ||
| + | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG6LC_5hDXQ | ||
Revision as of 13:17, 2 September 2012
Welcome to Wikispooks!
We're glad you came.
You will probably want to read the help pages.
The page at WikiSpooks:Getting Started should help you get started. Peter P 21:49, 1 September 2012 (IST)
Judging by your contributions to date (5 single para articles in 24 hours!), your understanding of what Wikispooks is about falls short of what is required. Sorry to be so blunt but that's the way it appears. The site is not a suitable home for sensational, unreferenced assertions stated as fact. I have deleted all of them and converted a couple to stub pages since their titles are suitable WS subjects. I suggest you spend some time studying the project pages before making further contributions. --Peter P 07:18, 2 September 2012 (IST)
Thanks for your advice Peter. Sorry to hear you value Life and Truth so cheaply. Since when was the CIA Research at Stanford unreferenced! You have shown your true colors, better Luck next incarnation? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG6LC_5hDXQ
