Difference between revisions of "Ian Puddick"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 15: Line 15:
 
==Ian's initial actions==
 
==Ian's initial actions==
 
Ian's learned of the affair on Sunday  24 May 2009. Like anyone in his position, he was both angry and upset. The main focus of his anger - again naturally enough - was his wife's boss (Mr X).
 
Ian's learned of the affair on Sunday  24 May 2009. Like anyone in his position, he was both angry and upset. The main focus of his anger - again naturally enough - was his wife's boss (Mr X).
*Monday 25 May 2009: Ian made a single contact with the Mr X by telephone informing him that he knew of the affair and generally conversing in a manner to be  expected in the circumstances. He was told to mind his own business; that Mr X had nothing to say to him; and not to call again or else….
+
*On Monday 25 May 2009 (the day after he learned of the affair) Ian made a single contact with the Mr X by telephone informing him that he knew of the affair and generally conversing in a manner to be  expected in the circumstances. He was told to mind his own business; that Mr X had nothing to say to him; and not to call again or else….
*On Tuesday 26 May 2009, just two days after he had learned of the affair, Ian telephoned the Chairman of Guy Carpenter Ltd, Nick Frankland. Mr Frankland was sympathetic, polite, conciliatory and professional. It was an attempt to resolve issues amicably by a man who was in an emotionally devastated state. Ian was impressed with Franklands attitude.
+
*Tuesday 26 May 2009: Ian telephoned the Chairman of Guy Carpenter Ltd, Nick Frankland. Mr Frankland was sympathetic, polite, conciliatory and professional. It was an attempt to resolve issues amicably by a man who was in an emotionally devastated state. Ian was impressed with Franklands attitude.
*On 11 June 2009 Ian visited Mr X's wife at home and informed her of the affair and showed here his wife's letter confirming it. He did not show her any other documents.
+
*On 11 June 2009 Ian visited Mr X's wife at home and informed her of the affair and showed her his wife's letter confirming it. He did not show her any other documents.
  
Having learned that the affair had been facilitated by improper use of a company expense account, Ian went on to inform several of Mr X's clients of the affair and to tell them that Mr X was "a person of no integrity".  Not the most judicious of actions perhaps but, in all the circumstances understandable - even reasonable.
+
Having learned that the affair had been facilitated by improper use of a company expense account, Ian went on to inform several of Mr X's clients of the affair and to tell them that Mr X was "''a person of no integrity''".  Not the most judicious of actions perhaps but, in all the circumstances understandable - even reasonable.
  
 
==Guy Carpenter Ltd's response==
 
==Guy Carpenter Ltd's response==

Revision as of 12:42, 7 June 2011

Tools.png 7 June 2011:This is an early work in progress. If you are here to find out more about Ian Puddick than is here already, be sure to check "See Also" and Video Links below.

Tools.png Ian is defending a criminal charge of Harassment at Horseferry Road Magistrates Court, London from 10:00am on 15 June 2011. Considerable potential content is therefore being withheld from publication in this article until after the court hearing

IanPuddick1.JPG

Ian Puddick is a Londoner who, from the summer of 2009 found himself embroiled in - and victim of - an almost unbelievable saga of corruption and gross abuse of power by large city corporations and the City of London police.

Introduction

In May 2009, Ian Puddick was a 39 year old married man minding his own business - which was a small plumbing company employing 20 people. Typical of hundreds of thousands of other self-employed individuals, though with the less typical drive required to build a business from scratch, he had similarly typical views of his country's police, political and legal authorities; viz that they may have their share of bumbling, incompetent jobsworths - even the odd corrupt 'rotten apple' - but all were basically well-meaning law-abiding/upholding organisations doing their best to 'serve the public' - after all they do style themselves public servants don't they?

Like many before him, Ian's cosy view of the country he inhabits was poised for a radical challenge which would turn it on its head.

The catalyst was another common enough occurrence: Ian's discovery of his wife's long-standing affair with her boss. As Ian himself observes, had the affair been with the milkman or other plebeian, whilst he would have been similarly upset and his response little or no different, that would have been the end of the matter. But it wasn't. His wife's boss just happened to be a director of Guy Carpenter Ltd, the world's largest reinsurance broker, retaining Kroll Associates UK Ltd - part of the worlds most notorious provider of privatized spying and covert intelligence/dirty tricks know-how to those with pockets deep enough to pay for it - for its risk management and mitigation needs.

Ian quickly found himself to be a large company risk in dire need of management and mitigation.

Ian's initial actions

Ian's learned of the affair on Sunday 24 May 2009. Like anyone in his position, he was both angry and upset. The main focus of his anger - again naturally enough - was his wife's boss (Mr X).

  • On Monday 25 May 2009 (the day after he learned of the affair) Ian made a single contact with the Mr X by telephone informing him that he knew of the affair and generally conversing in a manner to be expected in the circumstances. He was told to mind his own business; that Mr X had nothing to say to him; and not to call again or else….
  • Tuesday 26 May 2009: Ian telephoned the Chairman of Guy Carpenter Ltd, Nick Frankland. Mr Frankland was sympathetic, polite, conciliatory and professional. It was an attempt to resolve issues amicably by a man who was in an emotionally devastated state. Ian was impressed with Franklands attitude.
  • On 11 June 2009 Ian visited Mr X's wife at home and informed her of the affair and showed her his wife's letter confirming it. He did not show her any other documents.

Having learned that the affair had been facilitated by improper use of a company expense account, Ian went on to inform several of Mr X's clients of the affair and to tell them that Mr X was "a person of no integrity". Not the most judicious of actions perhaps but, in all the circumstances understandable - even reasonable.

Guy Carpenter Ltd's response

  • Late June 2009: Ian received an anonymous telephone call from a man who told him: "you have no idea who you're fucking with, we have deep, deep pockets and we will fuck you like you have never been fucked before." He did not know it at the time, but among the documents provided by the court discovery process in October 2009 was Kroll Associates UK Ltd Managing Director Ben Hamilton's statement which, paraphrased says: "I got a clean phone, called Puddick and told him you have no idea who we are, we have deep deep pockets .." - No foul language mentioned - naturally - but enough to positively identify the caller beyond reasonable doubt.

Subsequent Events

The Wall St CIA

In the US, Kroll are known as "The Wall St CIA". [1] Their profile in the UK is similar and they have a relationship with the City of London Police which might best be described as "Cosy". That relationship quickly became a major strand of Kroll's "Risk Mitigation" work for Guy Carpenter Ltd. A narrative was constructed. It had Ian Puddick as a "threatening violent person". It was a total fabrication with no basis whatsoever in fact, but coming from "The Wall St CIA", it had a certain ring to it.

Secret court order

The narrative was constructed following a court order obtained through the good offices of Buckingham Palace Lawyers [2] on 19 July 2009. The application for the order was heard in secret and without the knowledge of Ian Puddick. It alleged that, in the context of aviation insurance, "persons unknown had contacted clients of Guy Carpenter Limited and made threats of physical violence" - in other words it pushed all the right buttons. The application was successful and Ian Puddick's Bank account and telephone records, together with permission to monitor his telephones and those of his employees were handed to The Wall Street CIA - You couldn't make this up could you?

Ian's Wife called to a meeting

Ian's wife was then called to a meeting with a City of London Police officer' by the name of Dan Valor (Though the C of L Police have no record of such a meeting). At the meeting it was suggested that Ian's wife had fabricated the affair and the related expenses allegations - jealousy over Ian's lowly 'Plumber' status -v- that of her billionaire boss being the suggested motive (honest!). Ian's wife confirmed both the affair and the expenses fraud.

Dirty Tricks begin

Apropos Ben Hamilton's earlier foul-mouthed threats, a dirty tricks campaign then started:

  • Ian begins to received anonymous threatening telephone calls.
  • Ian's accountant is called anonymously and told that Ian is a convicted drugs dealer.

Operation Bohan

Video List

See Also

References

  1. Kroll Inc - The Wall St CIA
  2. Mishcon de Reya - Lawyers to those who can afford the very best legal advice