File:Collateral Damage - part 1.pdf

File provenance

Part 1 of a report by EP Heidner a former employee of the DIA Office of Naval Intelligence.
Source Israel Shamir web site

• The contents of this file are also available on Wikispooks in standard wiki format Here
• File:Collateral Damage - part 2.pdf - Part 2 of the report

Wikispooks comment

This report is probably the single most important analysis of the events of 9/11 that Wikispooks has seen. It is an in-depth analysis of US/UK post-WWII covert operations and criminal banking activities originating with hidden 'Yamashita' and NAZI gold; it demonstrates Western complicity in the 1991 Moscow coup which heralded the collapse of the Soviet Union and shows that the faudulent instruments used to finance these events and the subsequent looting of Soviet industry, were at the heart of the 9/11 attacks. Ostensible maturity/settlement/roll-over for these instruments were dated through 2001 and would have clinched several high-level criminal investigations had they been allowed to expire normally.

The report argues that 9/11 was staged primarily to bury 'the biggest financial crimes in history'. It does not exclude the other well understood motives epitomised by the notorious September 2000 PNAC report File:RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf and the Wikispooks 9/11:Israel did it article; rather it dovetails neatly with both.

Collateral Damage: U.S. Covert Operations and the Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001

On September 11, 2001 the definition of National Security changed for most U.S. citizens. For an entire postwar generation, “National Security” meant protection from nuclear attack. On that day, Americans redefined that threat. On September 11, 2001 three hijacked airliners hit three separate buildings with such precision and skill that many observers believe those flights were controlled by something other than the poorly trained hijackers in the cockpits. This report contends that not only were the buildings targets, but that specific offices within each building were the designated targets. These offices unknowingly held information which if exposed, subsequently would expose a national security secret of unimaginable magnitude. Protecting that secret was the motivation for the September 11th attacks. This report is about that national security secret: its origins and impact. The intent of the report is to provide a context for understanding the events of September 11th rather than to define exactly what happened that day.

Initially, it is difficult to see a pattern to the destruction of September 11th other than the total destruction of the World Trade Center, a segment of the Pentagon, four commercial aircraft and the loss of 2,993 lives. However, if the perceived objective of the attack is re-defined from its commonly suggested ‘symbolic’ designation as either ‘a terrorist attack’ or a ‘new Pearl Harbor,’ and one begins by looking at it as purely a crime with specific objectives (as opposed to a political action), there is a compelling logic to the pattern of destruction. This article provides research into the early claims by Dick Eastman, Tom Flocco, V.K. Durham and Karl Schwarz that the September 11th attacks were meant as a cover-up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on September 11th.1 After six years of research, this report presents corroborating evidence which supports their claims, and proposes a new rationale for the September 11th attacks. In doing so, many of the anomalies – or inconvenient facts surrounding this event - take on a meaning that is consistent with the claims of Eastman et al. The hypothesis of this report is: the attacks of September 11th were intended to cover-up the clearing of $240 billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’ western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas. The attacks of September 11th also served to derail multiple Federal investigations away from crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. In doing so, the attacks were justified under the cardinal rule of intelligence: “protect your resources”2 and consistent with a modus operandi of sacrificing lives for a greater cause.