Difference between revisions of "WW2/Attack on Pearl Harbor"
< WW2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(John Ainsworth-Davis' claims) |
(surprise attack) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|description=Was FDR really unaware this was coming?... | |description=Was FDR really unaware this was coming?... | ||
|perpetrators=Japanese Navy | |perpetrators=Japanese Navy | ||
| + | |ON_constitutes=Casus belli, Surprise attack | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Official narrative== | ==Official narrative== | ||
Revision as of 08:38, 31 July 2015
| Perpetrators | Japanese Navy |
|---|---|
| Interest of | Robert Stinnett |
| Description | Was FDR really unaware this was coming?... |
Official narrative
This came as a complete surprise to the US military leadership.
Alternative theories
The main competing narrative is that Franklin Roosevelt had been informed of the attack, but that he did not pass this information on to Hawaii, because he wanted a convincing casus belli that would put the US populace firmly behind the war effort.
Claims
John Ainsworth-Davis wrote in 2006 in Op JB that under the command of Ian Flemming, he destroyed the Dutch submarine K-XVII after they stumbled across the Japanese fleet heading for Hawaii.[1]
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
External Sites
- Radio show on The Pearl Harbour Attack - Fooling most of the people most of the time.
- PEARL HARBOR - Mother of all Conspiracies
- ↑ Op JB, John Ainsworth-Davis pp.112-113, Appendix 1
