Difference between revisions of "User talk:JasonCarswell"
(→Congratulations: new section) |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Two days ago a page you created was getting as much traffic as the rest of the site put together! It's still getting a lot.<ref>https://wikispooks.com/piwik/index.php?module=CoreHome&action=index&idSite=1&period=day&date=yesterday#?module=Actions&action=menuGetPageUrls&idSite=1&period=day&date=yesterday</ref> -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 13:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | Two days ago a page you created was getting as much traffic as the rest of the site put together! It's still getting a lot.<ref>https://wikispooks.com/piwik/index.php?module=CoreHome&action=index&idSite=1&period=day&date=yesterday#?module=Actions&action=menuGetPageUrls&idSite=1&period=day&date=yesterday</ref> -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 13:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : {{ping:Robin}} I wonder what happened in the news to make folks curious again. (I have been out of the loop for the last couple/few weeks. Before that I overdosed on trying to keep up.) If I knew it'd get that much attention I would have tried harder, though I wouldn't change too much. All I did was list some things, a couple insights, and kinda mirrored DuckDuckGo results. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : If anything, this solidifies my strong belief that sometimes people just want aggregated lists. From there they can fork off on their own in pursuit of knowledge to make up their own conclusions. I have several ideas about how we might streamline/improve lists here. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : You showed me a link like this before. It didn't work for me then as now. I was hoping it would be a graph or something. Maybe I'm doing it wrong or need a plugin? ~ '''<font face="Arial">[[User:JasonCarswell|<font color="black">JasonCarswell</font>]] <small>[[User talk:JasonCarswell|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 18:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 31 December 2019
WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE
13:16 Wednesday 24 April 2024
Please click "New section" above to leave any new message, and please sign your message (just type ~~~~).
If you leave a message here, I will reply here unless you ask me to reply elsewhere, to make discussions easier to read.
If you reply to a message here, please indent (start the line with ":"), and sign your message.
If you are discussing any particular page, please provide a link to it - it makes life easier for me and anyone else seeing this page.
Welcome to Wikispooks!
We're glad you came. There's lots to do.
The Community portal is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go here. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. Peter P (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2016 (IST)
InfoGalactic articles
Neither person has requested article deletion from Wikispooks - so feel free to import content from elsewhere. Robin (talk) 21:25, 28 June 2017 (IST)
- I'm sorry it's been so long. I don't remember what the conversation was about that your reply above refers to. Also, after going to all the effort to create good articles about Pearse and Tom, then them demanding it be taken down, then them treating me like shit - I went into depression for a few weeks.
- If you want the deleted InfoGalactic articles I still have them. To be honest, Wikispooks is incredibly slow. I'm not a journalist, reporter, etc. but I hate globalists, corruption, etc. so I don't have as much to offer as far as original content. I prefer IG because I'm familiar with the Wikipedia format which InfoGalactic uses, and is not censored like WP, and they have the massive architecture of WP so a link will go to that article (even if outdated). Still I like Wikispooks. I just wish it was faster.
- ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 04:08, 23 July 2017 (IST)
Congratulations
Two days ago a page you created was getting as much traffic as the rest of the site put together! It's still getting a lot.[1] -- Robin (talk) 13:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping:Robin I wonder what happened in the news to make folks curious again. (I have been out of the loop for the last couple/few weeks. Before that I overdosed on trying to keep up.) If I knew it'd get that much attention I would have tried harder, though I wouldn't change too much. All I did was list some things, a couple insights, and kinda mirrored DuckDuckGo results.
- If anything, this solidifies my strong belief that sometimes people just want aggregated lists. From there they can fork off on their own in pursuit of knowledge to make up their own conclusions. I have several ideas about how we might streamline/improve lists here.
- You showed me a link like this before. It didn't work for me then as now. I was hoping it would be a graph or something. Maybe I'm doing it wrong or need a plugin? ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 18:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
