Difference between revisions of "US/Supreme Court"
< US
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(fix date) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|captionPlural= Notable Supreme Court Cases | |captionPlural= Notable Supreme Court Cases | ||
|mainlabel = Case Name | |mainlabel = Case Name | ||
| − | |properties=Has | + | |properties=Has plaintiff/Has defendant/Display date/Description |
| − | |headers=Defendants | + | |headers=Plaintiffs/Defendants/Date/Description |
}} | }} | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
Revision as of 17:40, 26 May 2014
 US/Supreme Court     | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Formation | 1789 |
| Headquarters | Washington, D.C. |
| Type | legal |
| Interest of | Linda Greenhouse |
In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about Donald Rumsfeld by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "enhanced interrogation" techniques.[1][2]
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html
- ↑ http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/
