Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ukraine coup 2014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Subheadings: new section) |
m (reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The (sub)headings are should be accessible to the uninitiated on this topic - so "Evidence that the Maidan snipers were NOT government security personnel" is too specific (apart from the UNWANTED CAPS - I'd choose italics). I suggest a more general heading (e.g. "Contradictory Evidence", "Faul Play?" etc.) - let the reader read the specific details in the text as required. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 10:41, 9 March 2014 (GMT) | The (sub)headings are should be accessible to the uninitiated on this topic - so "Evidence that the Maidan snipers were NOT government security personnel" is too specific (apart from the UNWANTED CAPS - I'd choose italics). I suggest a more general heading (e.g. "Contradictory Evidence", "Faul Play?" etc.) - let the reader read the specific details in the text as required. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 10:41, 9 March 2014 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Dive in Robin - your edits always improve things and I'm so immersed in the minutiae of this and its horribly complex antecedents that I'm paying less attention to style than I should - just trying not to miss stuff that the {{ccm}} supress/ignore. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 13:46, 9 March 2014 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 13:46, 9 March 2014
Subheadings
The (sub)headings are should be accessible to the uninitiated on this topic - so "Evidence that the Maidan snipers were NOT government security personnel" is too specific (apart from the UNWANTED CAPS - I'd choose italics). I suggest a more general heading (e.g. "Contradictory Evidence", "Faul Play?" etc.) - let the reader read the specific details in the text as required. Robin (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
- Dive in Robin - your edits always improve things and I'm so immersed in the minutiae of this and its horribly complex antecedents that I'm paying less attention to style than I should - just trying not to miss stuff that the commercially-controlled media supress/ignore. --Peter P (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2014 (GMT)
