Difference between revisions of "Talk:Limited hangout"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
:::*[[Weasel word]]
 
:::*[[Weasel word]]
 
:::*[[Willful ignorance]]
 
:::*[[Willful ignorance]]
 
+
Also, would the [[Panama Papers]] be considered a limited hangout that hurt few Americans?
 
~ [[User:JasonCarswell|JasonCarswell]] ([[User talk:JasonCarswell|talk]]) 22:41, 16 August 2016 (IST)
 
~ [[User:JasonCarswell|JasonCarswell]] ([[User talk:JasonCarswell|talk]]) 22:41, 16 August 2016 (IST)

Revision as of 00:06, 17 August 2016

Searchtraffic.jpg
This is a high traffic page. As of March 2015, this was Google's #5 hit on modified limited hangout

Include Concept(s) Or Part(s)?

I read this WikiSpooks Article identical to the Wikipedia article with additions, and the RationalWiki article. The RationalWiki had the following section I thought might be worthy for your consideration to re-edit and include:

=Counter-examples=
=See also=

Also, would the Panama Papers be considered a limited hangout that hurt few Americans? ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2016 (IST)