Talk:Climategate

From Wikispooks
Revision as of 06:23, 16 March 2021 by MolecCodicies (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Article treats mainstream consensus as if it were absolutely definitive, even citing a Scientific American “fact check” as proof there was no misconduct. Anyone who reads...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Article treats mainstream consensus as if it were absolutely definitive, even citing a Scientific American “fact check” as proof there was no misconduct. Anyone who reads the document at the bottom of the article can plainly see that this claim is false and misconduct was rampant. Author of this version of the article clearly did not do so.