Difference between revisions of "Talk:9-11/Israel did it"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Lots of problems and issues with this article. It illustrates the difficulty of using an existing HTML (or other non-wiki) source as the the copy/paste/edit basis for a wiki art...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The following need attention:
 
The following need attention:
*Friendly-fi the YouTube links with explanatory text (embedding not really an option because it would slow the page down and make the text too disjointed).
+
*Friendly-fi the YouTube links with explanatory text (embedding not really an option because it would slow the page down and make the text too disjointed). - '''Done --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 13:46, 23 September 2010 (IST) '''
 
*Masses of references to insert - lots available from the original source.
 
*Masses of references to insert - lots available from the original source.
 
*Information about anomalous trading in AAL and UAL securities needed - records destroyed in WT7; links (if they exist) to Zionist individuals/organisations etc. To go in evidence of pre-knowledge.
 
*Information about anomalous trading in AAL and UAL securities needed - records destroyed in WT7; links (if they exist) to Zionist individuals/organisations etc. To go in evidence of pre-knowledge.

Revision as of 12:46, 23 September 2010

Lots of problems and issues with this article. It illustrates the difficulty of using an existing HTML (or other non-wiki) source as the the copy/paste/edit basis for a wiki article, rather than simply authoring from scratch.

The following need attention:

  • Friendly-fi the YouTube links with explanatory text (embedding not really an option because it would slow the page down and make the text too disjointed). - Done --Peter P 13:46, 23 September 2010 (IST)
  • Masses of references to insert - lots available from the original source.
  • Information about anomalous trading in AAL and UAL securities needed - records destroyed in WT7; links (if they exist) to Zionist individuals/organisations etc. To go in evidence of pre-knowledge.
  • Lots of grammatical inconsistencies.
  • Probably a few others.
--Peter P 11:49, 23 September 2010 (IST)