Special Administrative Measures

From Wikispooks
Revision as of 15:26, 5 October 2020 by Patrick Haseldine (talk | contribs) (Importing from WP and expanding)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Concept.png SAMs Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png

Special Administrative Measures (SAMs) is a process under United States law whereby the US/Attorney General may direct the United States Bureau of Prisons to use "special administrative measures" regarding housing of and correspondence and visitors to specific inmates. It includes prisoners awaiting or being tried, as well as those convicted, when it is alleged there is a "substantial risk that a prisoner's communications or contacts with persons could result in death or serious bodily injury to persons, or substantial damage to property that would entail the risk of death or serious bodily injury to persons." SAMs are used to prevent acts of violence or terrorism or disclosure of classified information.[1]

The law is considered particularly controversial because it permits monitoring of attorney-client communications of designated prisoners.[2] Initiated in November 2001, the US Department of Justice considered this an expansion of an existing regulation. Formerly it was only allowed through a court order. It specified that information protected by attorney-client privilege could not be used for prosecution; however, communications related to ongoing or contemplated illegal acts was not covered."[3]

As of 22 May 2009, 44 out of 205,000 federal inmates were subject to SAMs, 29 incarcerated on terrorism-related charges, 11 on violent crime-related charges and four on espionage charges.[4] Well known individuals who have been under Special Administrative Measures include American Taliban supporter John Walker Lindh[5] and organised crime figure Frank Calabrese, Sr.[6] Perhaps the best known application of this provision was the prosecution of attorney Lynne Stewart and interpreter Mohamed Yousry for passing messages between Omar Abdel-Rahman and his supporters in violation of a special administrative measure against communications.[7] After her conviction, sentencing and re-sentencing to 10 years in prison, she appealed on freedom of speech grounds.[8] Other cases include Robert Hanssen, Syed Fahad Hashmi (see below), and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Boston Marathon bomber,[9] who never could speak privately to his attorneys.

 

Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Your Man in the Public Gallery: Assange Hearing Day 16blog post24 September 2020Craig Murray"As James Lewis QC and Edward Fitzgerald QC exchange pleasantries, as the friendly clerks try to make the IT systems work, and my mind swims in horrified disbelief. They are discussing a fate for Julian Assange, my friend, as horrible as that of the thousands who over 500 years were dragged from this very spot and strung up outside. They are all chatting and working away as though we were a normal part of civilised society."
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References

Wikipedia.png This page imported content from Wikipedia on 5 October 2020.
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks.   Original page source here