Difference between revisions of "Snopes"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
=="Irresponsible Facebook posts"==
 
=="Irresponsible Facebook posts"==
[[Snopes]] reported that "an irresponsible [[Facebook]] post claimed that multiple gunmen were involved in the mass shooting at Orlando Pulse, and that two of them were still at large."<ref>https://www.snopes.com/multiple-shooters-orlando-cody-agnew/</ref><ref>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=135233</ref>
+
On 13 June 2016, [[Snopes]] reported that "an irresponsible [[Facebook]] post [2 days earlier] claimed that multiple gunmen were involved in the mass shooting at Orlando Pulse, and that two of them were still at large."<ref>https://www.snopes.com/multiple-shooters-orlando-cody-agnew/</ref><ref>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=135233</ref>
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 +
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 01:01, 20 December 2017

Named as a fact-checking site.

Snopes.png
Website.png http://www.snopes.com  Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Started: 1995
Founder: David P. Mikkelson

Owner: Proper Media

Main focus: urban legends, Fake news  

Sub-Page

          Page Name          Size
Snopes/Field Guide to Fake News Sites and Hoax Purveyors598

Snopes is a long established website which emerged from the alt.folklore.urban newsgroup and was originally a reference site about urban legends. In recent years it has become a staunch defender of the official narratives, to the extent that it has been referred to as "the go-to website for CIA propaganda".[1]

MLK assassination

Full article: MLK assassination

Snopes stated that the rumour that "the U.S. government was sued and found culpable for the murder of Martin Luther King, Jr., but the news media refused to report it" was "mostly false", starting its article "Intermittently, rumors have circulated on social media holding that the United States government was found guilty in 1999 of conspiring to assassinate Martin Luther King, Jr. Furthermore, according to these rumors, the reason this relatively new information (King was murdered on 4 April 1968) comes as a surprise to many is the “mainstream media” intentionally suppressed it after the government’s role in King’s death was exposed. It’s common for exaggerated claims to contain a few elements of truth, and that factor comes into play in this conspiracy theory rumor for a few reasons."[2]

While the site does admits that the jury unanimously found that "others, including governmental agencies, were parties to this conspiracy as alleged by the defendant", it states that “the verdict was of no real significance given that virtually nothing was at stake (this was not a criminal trial, and the defendant was only being sued for a mere $100 and thus had little motivation for vigorously defending himself, allowing the King family to present a mostly unopposed version of events and guide the jury to return the verdict they desired.” [3]

September 11, 2001

Full article: Rated 4/5 9-11
The #5 of Snopes' 9-11 conspiracies, about the wingdings font

Snopes has a category of "9/11 conspiracies" in which it presents a range of 9-11 related rumors wit minimal deep political content.[4] As of 2017, their top conspiracy was the claim that Nostradamus predicted the September 11 attacks, which they term "the granddaddy of all 9/11 rumors", #2 concerned a rescue dog named Daisy, #3 was about a beer advert, #4 a faked digital photo of a tourist and #5 the windings font.[5]

"Irresponsible Facebook posts"

On 13 June 2016, Snopes reported that "an irresponsible Facebook post [2 days earlier] claimed that multiple gunmen were involved in the mass shooting at Orlando Pulse, and that two of them were still at large."[6][7]

 

Related Quotation

PageQuoteAuthorDate
David Mikkelson“A recent BuzzFeed investigation discovered that between 2015 and 2019, the [Snopes] CEO wrote and published at least 54 plagiarized articles containing material from outlets such as The Guardian and the Los Angeles Times. Snopes conducted an internal review confirming the allegations and subsequently suspended Mikkelson from his editorial duties. He remains an officer and 50 percent shareholder of the company.”David Mikkelson
Alpha House
15 August 2021
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References