RationalWiki
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Official narrative
RationalWiki's stated missions are:[1][2]
- Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement
- Documenting the full range of crank ideas
- Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism
- Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media
Censorship
Although inviting readers to "register and engage in constructive dialogue", RationalWiki appears not to welcome essays critical of RationalWiki[3] or of certain official narratives. For example, it is dismissive of the Journal of 9/11 Studies, terming it, as of 2017, it a "peer- crank-reviewed, online, open source pseudojournal".[4] Its 9/11 page, as of 2017, was organiased as a sequence of (sometimes frivolous) concerns about the 9-11 Official Narrative, and a matching 'rebuttal'.[5] The page history revealed that all contrasting opinion was quickly reverted.[6]
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ Keeler, Mary; Johnson, Josh; Majumdar, Arun. "Crowdsourced Knowledge: Peril and Promise for Complex Knowledge Systems" (PDF). p. 4. Retrieved 2015-01-17.Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
- ↑ "RationalWiki Main Page". RationalWiki. Retrieved March 20, 2015.Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
- ↑ http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/2015/04/rational-wiki-censors-essay-criticizing-rational-wiki/
- ↑ http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Journal_of_9/11_Studies&oldid=1774765
- ↑ http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/11_September_2001
- ↑ http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=9-11&action=history
