Difference between revisions of "John Young"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{person
 
{{person
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Young_(Cryptome)
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Young_(Cryptome)
 +
|image=John Young.jpg
 
|spouses=Deborah Natsios
 
|spouses=Deborah Natsios
 
|description=
 
|description=
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}

Revision as of 08:27, 13 September 2016

Person.png John Young  Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
John Young.jpg
SpouseDeborah Natsios
Founder/Owner ofCryptome

 

Documents by John Young

TitleDocument typePublication dateSubject(s)Description
Document:Anonymous Surpasses Wikileaksarticle17 February 2011Wikileaks
'Anonymous'
Barrett Brown
HBGary
Document:NYT and Guardian on Wikileaksarticle4 February 2011Wikileaks
The Guardian
New York Times
Document:Nothing too Threatening to Publisharticle10 July 2011Cryptome
Document:Review of "Freedom and the Future of the Internet"book review30 November 2012Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet
Document:Snowden Civil Wararticle5 December 2013Surveillance State
Edward Snowden Affair
A pithy and on-the-button forecast from John Young about the how the Edward Snowden affair will likely pan out: if the NSA does not yet have effective control of the Snowden leaks, then they are going to make sure that those that have not been published already (i.e. >99% of Snowden's cache) never see the light of day. This is authoritative stuff from a seasoned professional.
Document:UK Library Spiesemail7 January 2011Surveillance State

 

Related Quotation

PageQuoteAuthorDate
CryptomeCryptome raises serious questions that nobody else on the left or in the media want to talk about, including how Omidar has created a business from Snowden's cache; what exactly Snowden may have been doing while he was working for the CIA prior to his time at NSA (and what else he may have been doing at NSA itself); and why Snowden and The Intercept continue to proselytize for Tor, the anonymization tool, despite its massive funding from the U.S. government, the Pentagon and the national security state.”Tim ShorrockFebruary 2016

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Secrets and Liesarticle1 September 2007John Cook
Document:That's Outrageousarticle1 March 2005Michael CrowleyA Readers Digest contributor is outraged, OUTRAGED I say, that a web site like Cryptome should be 'allowed to exist'. He does not intend humour at all, he is deadly serious - which is precisely what makes the piece so funny.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.