Difference between revisions of "Gaslighting"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(start)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|wikipedia = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
 
|wikipedia = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
 
|infogalactic = https://infogalactic.com/info/Gaslighting
 
|infogalactic = https://infogalactic.com/info/Gaslighting
|constitutes=  
+
|constitutes=deception
 
}}
 
}}
 
'''Gaslighting''' is a form of intimidation or [[psychological abuse]], where false information is presented to the victim, making them doubt their own memory or perception.<ref>https://www.nbcnews.com/better/health/what-gaslighting-how-do-you-know-if-it-s-happening-ncna890866</ref> It involves a person, or a group of persons, the mental abuser or the victimizer, and a second person, the victim. It can be either conscious or unconscious, and is carried out covertly such, that the resulting emotional abuse is not overtly abusive.
 
'''Gaslighting''' is a form of intimidation or [[psychological abuse]], where false information is presented to the victim, making them doubt their own memory or perception.<ref>https://www.nbcnews.com/better/health/what-gaslighting-how-do-you-know-if-it-s-happening-ncna890866</ref> It involves a person, or a group of persons, the mental abuser or the victimizer, and a second person, the victim. It can be either conscious or unconscious, and is carried out covertly such, that the resulting emotional abuse is not overtly abusive.
  
 +
==Techniques==
 
Gaslighting depends on "first convincing the victim that [the victim's] thinking is distorted and secondly persuading [the victim] that the victimizer's ideas are the correct and true ones". Gaslighting induces cognitive dissonance in the victim, "often quite emotionally charged cognitive dissonance", and makes the victim question their own thinking, perception, and reality testing, and thereby tends to evoke in them low self-esteem and disturbing ideas and affects, and may facilitate development of confusion, anxiety, depression, and in some extreme cases, even psychosis. After the victim loses confidence in their mental capacities and develops a sense of [[learned helplessness]], they become more susceptible to the victimizer's control.
 
Gaslighting depends on "first convincing the victim that [the victim's] thinking is distorted and secondly persuading [the victim] that the victimizer's ideas are the correct and true ones". Gaslighting induces cognitive dissonance in the victim, "often quite emotionally charged cognitive dissonance", and makes the victim question their own thinking, perception, and reality testing, and thereby tends to evoke in them low self-esteem and disturbing ideas and affects, and may facilitate development of confusion, anxiety, depression, and in some extreme cases, even psychosis. After the victim loses confidence in their mental capacities and develops a sense of [[learned helplessness]], they become more susceptible to the victimizer's control.
  
Line 23: Line 24:
  
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 16:09, 21 October 2020

Concept.png  
(deceptionInfogalacticRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png 5
Gaslight.jpg
The 1938 stage play Gas Light that showed systematic psychological manipulation of a victim by her husband.
Something is done to a person (the victim) and the other (the abuser) tells that it does not exist.

Gaslighting is a form of intimidation or psychological abuse, where false information is presented to the victim, making them doubt their own memory or perception.[1] It involves a person, or a group of persons, the mental abuser or the victimizer, and a second person, the victim. It can be either conscious or unconscious, and is carried out covertly such, that the resulting emotional abuse is not overtly abusive.

Techniques

Gaslighting depends on "first convincing the victim that [the victim's] thinking is distorted and secondly persuading [the victim] that the victimizer's ideas are the correct and true ones". Gaslighting induces cognitive dissonance in the victim, "often quite emotionally charged cognitive dissonance", and makes the victim question their own thinking, perception, and reality testing, and thereby tends to evoke in them low self-esteem and disturbing ideas and affects, and may facilitate development of confusion, anxiety, depression, and in some extreme cases, even psychosis. After the victim loses confidence in their mental capacities and develops a sense of learned helplessness, they become more susceptible to the victimizer's control.

The classic example of gaslighting is to switch something around on someone that you know they're sure to notice, but then deny knowing anything about it, and to explain that they "must be imagining things". A more psychological definition of gaslighting is "an increasing frequency of systematically withholding factual information from, and/or providing false information to, the victim - having the gradual effect of making them anxious, confused, and less able to trust their own memory and perception.

Sociopaths / Psychopaths / Narcissists

Sociopaths frequently use gaslighting tactics to abuse and undermine their victims.[2] Sociopaths consistently transgress social mores, break laws and exploit others, but typically also are convincing liars, sometimes charming ones, who consistently deny wrongdoing. Thus, some who have been victimized by sociopaths may doubt their own perceptions.[3] Some physically abusive spouses may gaslight their partners by flatly denying that they have been violent. Gaslighting may occur in parent–child relationships, with either parent, child, or both lying to the other and attempting to undermine perceptions.


 

An example

Page nameDescription
"Vaccine passport"

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Vanessa Beeley“The gargantuan apparatus of mind bending and controlling is being put into hyper drive by the ruling elite. We are inundated with propaganda that challenges our sense of reality but only after being “tenderized” by the fear factor. Fear of “terror”, fear of war, fear of financial insecurity, fear of gun violence, fear of our own shadow. Once we are suitably quaking in our boots, in comes the rendition of reality that relieves our anxiety. If we challenge this version of events we are labelled a conspiracy theorist, a threat to security. We are hounded, discredited, slandered and ridiculed. We are isolated and threatened.”Vanessa Beeley
Cass Sunstein“Once we know that people are human and have some Homer Simpson in them, then there’s a lot that can be done to manipulate them.”Cass Sunstein
WHO/Technical Advisory Group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health“The TAG is composed of renowned experts representing a broad range of disciplines relevant to behavioural insights and sciences, including psychology, behavioural economics, anthropology, social marketing and more. The group also brings together extensive experience in designing and implementing national health policies and programmes informed by behavioural insights and sciences; in evaluating the impact of behaviourally informed public health initiatives in low- and middle-income countries; and in setting up or running behavioural insights units in organizations.

WHO published the open call for experts in February 2020, soliciting proposals for members to serve on its TAG to inform the work of WHO’s newly established Behavioural Insights and Sciences Initiative. The group will provide expert advice for the development of a road map for WHO to define a mechanism to systematically include behavioural evidence in its work and in national health policies and programme planning. The recommendations of the expert group will be addressed to WHO across the three levels of the Organization (HQ, regional, and country offices). The TAG shall have the following functions:

  1. Advise WHO on how to adopt behavioural insights and science perspectives to support WHO’s 13th General Programme of Work and how to identify priority areas for implementation within WHO and in Member States;
  2. Make recommendations to WHO for the development of an operational framework for the mainstreaming of behavioural insights and sciences into WHO operations, particularly in the area of providing technical advice on national health policies and programme planning;
  3. Advise WHO on potential challenges and risks for the Organization related to the recommendations made by the TAG.”
WHO2020


Rating

5star.png 12 December 2021 Terje 
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References

Wikipedia.png This page imported content from Wikipedia on 21 October 2020.
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks.   Original page source here